Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's not only that -- I agree that it's their religion -- but it's also laziness and ignorance. As I said, the fascinating thing to me is that liberals run around proclaiming how into science they are. Then you ask them to discuss the topic and literally nobody knows anything about it. The totality of their knowledge about the subject is:
1) It's true.
What's worse is that they don't even comprehend the scientific flaws in their statements. Like, this guy posts about the scientific method. Fantastic. Now tell me what parts of it have climate scientists gone through. And they're like "what? All of them!" All of them? "Yeah ...I mean, I assume ..." Yeah, I guess so!
Most of these liberals have no scientific background at all, which is why they're struggling so much with this. But that's what's even funnier.
Most of us liberals dont really care that much about the issue ,however It seems you righties are obsessed with disproving what the global science community is saying.
if these scientific institutions say Climate Change: Consensus its warming up then fine its warming up,good enough for me, i dont need a masters degree in climatology to accept what they are saying, you on the other hand are claiming they are all lying and deceiving the worlds population,what scientific background do you have to make that assumption? masters degree in Climatology? or just a good little sheeple conforming to your fringe rightwing ideology.
So there data doesn't match your conclusion so scientists much be wrong because you say so. No thanks, I will listen to the experts that are doing the studying of climate change.
The IPCC AR5 report does not match anyone's data. They cite NASA and NOAA, then deliberate print bogus data that neither NASA nor NOAA published. That is why only 13 out of 1,117 participating climate scientists, or 1.2%, agree with the IPCC's conclusions. It is nothing more than a scam.
The IPCC AR5 report does not match anyone's data. They cite NASA and NOAA, then deliberate print bogus data that neither NASA nor NOAA published. That is why only 13 out of 1,117 participating climate scientists, or 1.2%, agree with the IPCC's conclusions. It is nothing more than a scam.
You are claiming this is all a scam? Rather an implausible possibility but supposing its not a scam and all those thousands of scientists are right and you are wrong.
The IPCC AR5 report does not match anyone's data. They cite NASA and NOAA, then deliberate print bogus data that neither NASA nor NOAA published. That is why only 13 out of 1,117 participating climate scientists, or 1.2%, agree with the IPCC's conclusions. It is nothing more than a scam.
According to the "scientists" that work in the Alberta tar sands...
I am stating flat out that the IPCC AR5 report is a deliberate lie, a complete fraud, rejected by 98.8% of the scientists that participated in the report.
For example, the NASA GISS data from 2010 shows a net overall increase in surface temperatures by 0.51°C. This equates to an average change of 0.039°C per decade.
Yet on page 187, table 2.4 of the IPCC AR5 report, they cite NASA's GISS 2010 data, but they somehow managed to come up with change of 0.095°C per decade. The IPCC deliberately misrepresenting the data, and continued to lie by claiming it is NASA's data when it clearly is not.
Most of us liberals dont really care that much about the issue ,however It seems you righties are obsessed with disproving what the global science community is saying.
if these scientific institutions say Climate Change: Consensus its warming up then fine its warming up,good enough for me, i dont need a masters degree in climatology to accept what they are saying, you on the other hand are claiming they are all lying and deceiving the worlds population,what scientific background do you have to make that assumption? masters degree in Climatology? or just a good little sheeple conforming to your fringe rightwing ideology.
Fascinatingly, all you said was that you proudly did not examine any data, but accepted something you were told without question. And that's how liberals in general act.
The political pendulum is always swinging as Biden said. and takes issue of special interest with it. Right now you have a lame duck president who can't pass anything since first mid term.In time the economy is becoming more and more the main issue as FED policy effects more and more with low interest rates. Tighter credit rules called consumer protection hasn't really take much effect as it will in time when FED starts raising rates.
Fascinatingly, all you said was that you proudly did not examine any data, but accepted something you were told without question. And that's how liberals in general act.
How much more data do i need to read I've posted a dozen or more sites that i've read on the issue.I could re post dozens of more links but just this one seems to suffice Climate Change: Consensus.
Ultimately i have my opinion on the subject and you have yours and thats the way its going to stay as you are never going to convince me the entire scientific community is all lying and deceiving us for some nefarious reason...
Last edited by Oldhag1; 04-13-2014 at 03:06 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Charles Krauthammer In Washington Post Warns Of Climate Totalitarianism---The Fascist Left
