Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-18-2014, 02:39 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,387,159 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
I'm gonna have to look at this a couple of times before I feel confident to comment.

But thanks for the post.
You're welcome.

 
Old 04-18-2014, 04:20 AM
 
1,143 posts, read 1,080,347 times
Reputation: 722
Default Global Warming Alarmist Snake Oil Salesman The UN Issues New 15 Year Climate Tipping Point--Complete Frauds

God I wish I had low live salesman that were good as these people. I'd be retired now.


Flashback March 2009: "We have hours' to prevent climate disaster"

'We have hours' to prevent climate disaster | Toronto Star

UK’s Gordon Brown warns of global warming ‘catastrophe’; Only ’50 days to save world’

BBC NEWS | UK | PM warns of climate 'catastrophe'

Alert: NASA’s James Hansen Declared Obama Has One Week Left To Save The Planet! — ‘On Jan. 17, 2009 Hansen declared Obama only ‘has four years to save Earth’ — Only 7 Days left!

President Obama 'has four years to save Earth' | Environment | The Observer

UN official Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program (UNEP), warned on May 11, 1982, the 'world faces an ecological disaster as final as nuclear war within a couple of decades unless governments act now.

UN 1982 : World To End Before The Year 2000 | Real Science

As early as 1989, the UN was already trying to sell their “tipping point” rhetoric to the public. See: .: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.– Excerpt: According to July 5, 1989, article in the Miami Herald, the then-director of the New York office of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Noel Brown, warned of a “10-year window of opportunity to solve” global warming. According to the 1989 article, “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.

Miami Herald: Search Results

Tom Nelson: Punxsutawney Al - Greenhouse Gashog

UK’s Top Scientist Sir David King in 2004: ‘Antarctica is likely to be the world’s only habitable continent by the end of this century if global warming remains unchecked’

An Important Message From The UK’s Top Scientist | Real Science

UK greenie George Monbiot 2002 warned we only had 10 years! ‘Famine can only be avoided if the rich give up meat, fish and dairy’– Monbiot on December 24, 2002: ‘Within as little as 10 years, the world will be faced with a choice: arable farming either continues to feed the world’s animals or it continues to feed the world’s people. It cannot do both’

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...ation-sets-in/

MIT to Obama: Only 4 years left to stop global warming: ‘It is quite possible that if this is not done over the next four years, it will be too late’ — MIT to Obama: ‘We can no longer pretend that addressing climate change will be without real costs’ — ‘You have the power and the opportunity to lay the groundwork for a new clean-energy policy that will help us avoid the worst consequences of climate change,” said the letter, published in the MITTechnology Review’

Obama warned: It's now or never on global warming | WashingtonExaminer.com

And just recently the King of low life states: Al Gore Calls Global Warming Skeptics “Immoral, Unethical And Despicable”

http://weaselzippers.us/183066-al-go...nd-despicable/
 
Old 04-18-2014, 04:59 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,165,232 times
Reputation: 1450
Misrepresentation of Sir David King's views (Ofcom Complaint by Category)
 
Old 04-18-2014, 05:41 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,858,535 times
Reputation: 9283
All I hear is it's almost too late and afterwards, hurry it's at the point of no return.... Then years later, we are on the brink of disaster.... Each time, their solution is to give them more money.... Global warming religion trying to scare and guilt you into giving them your money...
 
Old 04-18-2014, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Since it's obviously too late to save the planet, let's all just open a bottle of wine, light a cigar and chill out.
 
Old 04-18-2014, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99 View Post
If you do I'll pay you minimum wage.
No, then I'd have to teach you to count as well. I think it's best you just keep pathetically whining and crying about liberals because of your cowardice; stick with what you know.
 
Old 04-18-2014, 06:25 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,387,159 times
Reputation: 4113

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euGcVrsqAR4
 
Old 04-18-2014, 07:14 AM
 
105 posts, read 84,482 times
Reputation: 106
Boy if this doesn't sound like old time RELIGION! "The rapture is just around the corner, sinners, REPENT NOW!!"

This is entirely the problem with AGW movement, the alarmism rings a bit hollow after awhile and nobody takes you seriously anymore.

Why do we continue to lend this crowd credibility after SO many of their past predictions were wrong?

The sad fact of the matter is that we SHOULD clean up the environment, we SHOULD conserve and we SHOULD look for cleaner forms of energy but now those worthy goals have been lumped together and contaminated with all of the shrill AGW alarmism and people aren't listening.

I submit that the AGW movement has HURT environmental causes more than they've helped them because they've taken the extreme route and cried wolf so many times that most of the public now associates environmental protection with the leftist alarmist loons that have anointed themselves as the champions of the movement.

We need a sensible environmental movement that is not based in socialism, alarmism and greed. The current one that we have has gaffed it up so many times in so many ways, that they don't deserve any more credibility or attention.

Meanwhile, one sad result of this constant alarmism is schoolchildren being taught "science" by their liberal activist teachers and worrying that they won't have a world to live in when they grow up.
 
Old 04-18-2014, 07:48 AM
 
105 posts, read 84,482 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by EntropyGuardian View Post
why ISN'T reducing waste, finding renewable energy sources, and reducing chemical emissions in the air and water a good thing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun View Post
Because liberals.
I disagree. In my opinion, liberals and most environmentalists have done more damage to the cause of the environment than they've helped it.
With the constant alarmism and preaching the end of the world as we know it if we don't listen to them, most people have begun to tune out of anything that even smacks of environmentalism as a result.

Things like the asinine policy of taking ordinary lightbulbs and replacing them with toxic mercury bombs that have to have a room evacuated when they break. Then these bulbs are all made in China and shipped over on highly polluting container ships. Brilliant! We also know how much pride the Chinese put into safe manufacturing so I'm sure there is nothing to worry about

I'm not a big fan of the republican's track record on the issue either but it's your side that has made this your issue and anointed yourselves as the champions of it. Your side has also gaffed it up so badly that it's time no one should listen to you or lend you any more credibility on the matter.

Maybe we need bi-partisan or "non-partisan" environmental leadership and vision for a change!
 
Old 04-18-2014, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
So?

Explain to us little people what that means ...
That expanding sea ice just means cold air is swirling around more around the South Pole.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top