Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:12 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,748,463 times
Reputation: 14746

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
isn't there a law, that after you work land for so many years or live on land for so many years it's yours?
Property held by the federal government, a state, or a Municipal Corporation cannot be taken by adverse possession.

 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:14 PM
 
1,634 posts, read 1,210,510 times
Reputation: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Nope, this is a grotesque distortion. You cats are making huge illogical leaps that ignores context and meaning.

Look an organization that murders or beats people on the basis of skin color would be the definition of racist.

It would be the epitome of a real world example of how human beings experience racism.
No organization in America overtly does such a thing.
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:14 PM
 
2,003 posts, read 1,546,604 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
What do you not get about the following?More than half of the Blacks living in the South in 1860 were free.

Of those free Southern Blacks, only 10,689 lived in New Orleans.

That leaves over 250,000 free Blacks that lived elsewhere in the South.

A South Carolina Black, William Ellison, owned over 60 slaves.

I have never before seen so many BS excuses to deliberately hang onto self-chosen ignorance.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, roughly 3,950,000 black people were enslaved in the US in 1860, as opposed to roughly 476,000 free black people. This isn't much of a shock, since according to the law at the time, any white person from a slaver state could simply walk up to any black person and declare him or her to be his slave, and the black person had no way to fight it, unless he or she could find several white people to testify in court that he or she was free.

In other words, your numbers are junk.
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:14 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
This is back and forth is boring.
Then accept reality and stop living in your chip-on-the-shoulder fantasyland.

You've been brainwashed to believe you're a victim. Do you not recognize that such actually is a sad, sick form of racial oppression?
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:18 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadoken View Post
Meanwhile, back in the real world, roughly 3,950,000 black people were enslaved in 1860.
If you want to go with that number, fine. Only 500,000 Blacks lived in the South in 1860, more than half of which were free (linked earlier in thread). Therefore the other 3,700,000 slaves must have lived in the North.

Racist South? Hardly.
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:24 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,301,101 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChestRockwell View Post
No organization in America overtly does such a thing.
Huh?
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:28 PM
 
2,003 posts, read 1,546,604 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
If you want to go with that number, fine. Only 500,000 Blacks lived in the South in 1860, more than half of which were free (linked earlier in thread). Therefore the other 3,700,000 slaves must have lived in the North.

Racist South? Hardly.
Again, your link is garbage. Put it aside, talk to actual historians.
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,755,909 times
Reputation: 1633
Good vid..

» Cliven Bundy Calls on Sheriff to Start Arresting BLM Feds Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:31 PM
 
41 posts, read 28,800 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
So because this group of small minded a**holes hasn't acted out on it, you deny that it is a hateful message? Your message being accurate is your opinion. It is NOT fact. The FACT as stated in the definition in a dictionary says that they are indeed a racist due to their feelings that they are superior over someone with a different skin color, in this case white people. We are not disputing your experience with dealing with racism or oppression or that it was part of this nation's history at one time. However, it is only a partial definition of the word racism. Furthermore, isn't it black people that don't like when white people say these things about them? If it's not OK for white people to do it, or claim to be superior, and is offensive to you, then should it not be equally offensive when it is the other way around? I'm thinking if you don't see it that way, and the fact that you're blowing their message off as nothing to see, then perhaps you agree with their message?

Because...............slavery. Don't you get it?. Even though every race has enslaved every other race and been slaves themselves doesn't matter. I mean some were even targeted for genocide (Jews).

But you see black people are the only ones allowed to hold on to past grievances. Even if they weren't slave or can even trace any of their ancestors to being slaves, doesn't matter, they are still apart of the victims by just sharing skin tone. Even if the vast majority of whites never owned slaves, doesn't matter. They are still bigots and the devil.

I mean the fact that you people have to reach over a hundred years into the past over something that you may not even share any blood relation to justify this just shows you want to hold on to your victim status so that you can dictate to others what is and what isn't acceptable. Believing that whites are inferior, the devils and weak is racist. You can't deny that because you want to hold on to slavery of which didn't even happen to you or even anyone in your family tree. Your victim card is about to expire.

A black multimillionaire with global recognition and kicks it up with the president at the White House and you people are still whining about the "white devils" and "slavery"?......Come off it. No one is buying this crap anymore but your fellow race huslters.

You think that white people are the devils and inferior? That's ok........why?......slavery......Were you a slave?......No....are you the descendants of slaves?......No....Are you even oppressed?.....No......Then why?.....because I said so. Smh.

Last edited by AlexSliver; 04-11-2014 at 01:42 PM..
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,474,039 times
Reputation: 8599
During a Moapa Valley town hall meeting last night, Bundy said he went to visit Sheriff Gillespie a few days ago but “found him hiding under the table”.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top