Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-22-2014, 08:38 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,600,924 times
Reputation: 16439

Advertisements

A 6-2 ruling upheld states' rights to ban this nonsense. This is the best decision of the 21st century next to extending federal marriage rights to all married couples! Sometimes SCOTUS gets it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2014, 08:46 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,337,216 times
Reputation: 8066
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/us...-ban.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 08:51 AM
 
Location: San Francisco born/raised - Las Vegas
2,819 posts, read 2,114,762 times
Reputation: 1905
Supreme Court upholds ban on affirmative action in college admissions - Stephanie Simon and Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com

Excellent! I am all for this. AA punishes the qualified. AA affords the less qualified a false sense of accomplishment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 08:56 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,685,403 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
A 6-2 ruling upheld states' rights to ban this nonsense. This is the best decision of the 21st century next to extending federal marriage rights to all married couples! Sometimes SCOTUS gets it right.
OMG! Leaving the decision up to the voters in the states!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 08:56 AM
 
13,966 posts, read 5,634,219 times
Reputation: 8621
Well, since affirmative action violates letter and spirit of both the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act, it's nice to see the Supreme Court deciding that states can actually ban such violations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 09:00 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,789,910 times
Reputation: 4174
Jim Crow laws die SO hard. Nice to see one more bite the dust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 09:06 AM
 
3,620 posts, read 3,838,522 times
Reputation: 1512
im mixed on this, as i do consider legacy admissions to be a form of affirmative action for whites, specifically white males who should not be on the campus to begin with, and only got in because of dad going there and donating money. i understand that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 09:06 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,409,783 times
Reputation: 4025
*scratches head* I thought quotas were ruled unconstitutional over two decades ago?

Still, good luck proving AA in court. How is this any different from preferential treatment from alumni connections? ("old boy network")
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,537,471 times
Reputation: 2363
At the University of Michigan, you get 4 points on your Admission score if you are a legacy. Being a preferred minority nets you 20 points. Yep, sack them both. And if this kind of preference really should not be there, when are we talking about all the "special admits" that many colleges use to get *ahem* student athletes into their schools? Shouldn't that preference be dropped too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2014, 09:19 AM
 
3,620 posts, read 3,838,522 times
Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
*scratches head* I thought quotas were ruled unconstitutional over two decades ago?

Still, good luck proving AA in court. How is this any different from preferential treatment from alumni connections? ("old boy network")
its not. as i said in the prior post, legacy admissions are affirmative action for white males who do not belong on the campus to begin with, but just get in because dad went there and has money. the legacy admit rate at ivys is double the overall admit rate. those whites score much lower then the general admits.

i also agree that this wont change much, i still see universities admitting who they wantat the end of the day
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top