Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortoggie View Post
The latest data about hospital charges came out last week. In our area, which has ten hospitals the charges for the same procedure varies greatly. In one case a heart procedure was $ 73,000.00 more than the exact same work thirty miles away. There is no rhyme nor reason as to what hospitals charge.
Your hospital system.....is a mish-mash of structured entities.

1] Government hospitals: No, I'm not talking about the VA system, or the federal government. I'm talking about municipalities, counties, universities and States.

What did your Supreme Court say about healthcare? Healthcare is not Interstate Commerce.

Which part of "Boston General" do stupid idiots not understand?

Cue stupid people: What's the Republican Plan?

Cue your Supreme Court: Which part of intra-State Commerce do you not understand?

Government gives itself away with names like Boston General Hospital, Sarasota MemorialHospital, University of Detroit Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Hospital, Oak Ridge Municipal Hospital, Dearborn County Hospital, Longview State Hospital. etc etc etc.

Which is scarier: the fact that Americans are too dumb to understand, or the fact that those dumb Americans are allowed to vote?

It gets interesting....during the 1970s, many governments sold their interest in hospitals in whole or in part.

What does that mean? In some instances, the State, county, city, university or municipality still owns the building and the property, but a private group actually runs the hospital, usually a member of the American Hospital Association.

While in other instances, the hospital may be run jointly by the government and a private group.

Which brings us to "private groups."

Some private groups are For-Profit Hospitals, while others are For-Profit masquerading as a Non-Profit.

The latter is often the case when the American Hospital Association takes over a government hospital.

These private groups, of course, also run their own For-Profit Hospitals or For-Profit pretending to be Non-Profit. Charitable hospitals such as Sisters of Mercy or Franciscan Sister do not do anything for free or at cost.....they get a hefty profit.

This is all made worse by the fact that the American Hospital Association immorally and unethically grouped hospitals together in the late 1930s in an attempt to drive non-member hospitals out of business and gain monopoly control of hospitals (as though they were railroads or coal-mines or steel mills or shipyards or something). When I say non-member hospitals, I'm referring to either a hospital that was a member of the American Medical Association, or a hospital that was not affiliated with the AMA or AHA.

To gain monopoly control quicker, the American Hospital Association created the "Out-of-Network" Clause.

Insurance companies as a general rule do not offer health insurance in the 1930s. If you want health plan coverage, then you must buy it from a hospital. If you buy it from a hospital that is a member of the American Hospital Association, then you can only use your health plan coverage at other hospitals that were also members of the American Hospital Association.

You were certainly free to go to a hospital that was a member of the American Medical Association or not a member of anything, but the American Hospital Association would not pay your claims.

In 1946, when the American Hospital Association created the very first health insurance company -- the Blue Cross --- this Out-of-Network" Clause was the center-piece/corner-stone for them.

Later that year, the American Medical Association created the Blue Shield health insurance company.

Some might remember that everyone had Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

No.....wrong freaking answer....you didn't "have" rather you "got had."

The only way to guarantee that you were covered 100% and didn't get hit with "Out-of-Network" fees and charges is to buy both.

How freaking sad is that?

1949 was a water-shed event with the Supreme Court decision In Re: Inland Steel.

The Court's ruling sent a clear and convincing message that employer-sponsored group-based health plans were not just some passing fad created because the FDR levied a Wage & Price Freeze, rather it was here to stay.

Now, all the insurance jump into the game and damn near annihilate the American Hospital Association.

Why?

Two reasons:

1] the insurance companies used risk-based actuarial science, and so could offer plans much, much cheaper than the American Hospital Association's Blue Cross which was trapped into using a "Community Rating Scheme"; and

2] the insurance companies had real insurance, instead of fake insurance like that offered by the Blue Cross.

Here are your choices:

Choice #1: You can buy health plan coverage from the Blue Cross and pay premiums every single month from the day you start working until the day you retire, at which point you're screwed and have no health insurance.....

....or....

Choice #2: You can purchase a $2 Million policy, pay premiums for 10 years/120 months, never pay again for the rest of your life, be covered your entire life, and when you die, give your children, grand-children or charities $2 Million.

Which is the better deal?


Think.......think.......think........think....

Choice #2 is the better deal.

Did I mention that if you take Choice #2, you also have the option of paying a lower monthly premium, but paying over 20 years/240 months instead of 10 years? Do you think that having an option of 10 years or 20 years allows you to work around your priorities and the things going on in your life?

Did I mention that if you take Choice #2, you also have an option of paying an even lower monthly premium, but paying over 30 years/360 months instead of 10 or 20 years? Do you think that having an option of 10 years or 20 years or 30 years allows you to work around your priorities and the things going on in your life?

Did I mention that you can borrow against that $2 Million? Or maybe you choose a $1 Million policy instead of $2 Million, but then maybe you choose a $2.5 Million or a $1.5 Million or a $1.25 Million policy?

Why do you suppose Liberals --- who are Pro-Choice about killing un-born children -- vehemently deny you the opportunity to make these very, very important health and financial choices about your life?

For one thing, this would allow the Black Man to build wealth and pass that wealth onto his children.

Nothing frightens a Liberal more than a minority not needing government help.

A Black Man leaving $1.5 Million to his grand-children so that they might go to college without needing Guaranteed Student Loans just scares Liberals to death.

The mere thought that a poor person of any Color might actually move up the socio-economic ladder sends Liberals into a total panic -- and the thought of government not being involved, causes Liberals to panic and wet themselves.

Anyway, faced with a crushing defeat, the American Hospital Association ran to Congress and got this law enacted....

"Premiums paid by an employer on policies of group life insurance without cash surrender value covering the lives of his employees, or on policies of group health or accident insurance...do not constitute salary if such premiums are deductible by the employer under Section 23(a) of the IRS Code."

Source: Public Law 83-591, August 16, 1954; Internal Revenue Code of 1954, Section 106. For more information see the 1986 Internal Revenue Code.


Cash surrender value......that's the $2 Million.......$2 Million in health care payments, or $2 Million cash or a combination of $2 Million in cash and health benefits.

That put an end to that.

This is what intelligent compassionate people mean when they say "Free Market" -- they want Americans to have the ability to choose what is best for them, and to perhaps even profit off of their own healthcare, and then pass that wealth onto their children and grand-children.

If you want to lower the price of medical services, which will in turn lower the costs of health plan coverage, then repeal all of the harmful legislation at the federal and State levels that prevent you from paying less and getting more.

Financially...


Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:10 AM
 
2,776 posts, read 3,595,964 times
Reputation: 2312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortoggie View Post
The latest data about hospital charges came out last week. In our area, which has ten hospitals the charges for the same procedure varies greatly. In one case a heart procedure was $ 73,000.00 more than the exact same work thirty miles away. There is no rhyme nor reason as to what hospitals charge. This data was for 2012 and I think we lay people should track these reports and write letters to the editor and let the health care crooks know that we are watching and that one day we will find a way to stop their run away thievery.
The problem is you're not always comparing apples to apples. "exact same work" is kind of vague.

The person with the more expensive surgery may have been simply been sicker (co-morbidities) or required a more intensive procedure. A PTCA for one coronary artery with a plain metal stent is going to cost far less then a combined multi coronary artery CABG/PTCA with the newer drug eluting stents on a guy with poor lung function requiring a full heart-lung machines set up and the staff to run it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by remoddahouse View Post
YOu know when I go to McDonald's, In n Out, Burger King, Burgermaster, 5 Guys, etc, they all have different prices. Why would hospitals be any different. Do you see any private hospitals posting huge profit margins? They charge what they want. don't like it? Go somewhere else.
It also depends upon how many people partake of the care from the hospital and either don't have any money to pay, so the hospital eats it all.

Or whether the hospital has had a string of patients with some government insurance, which pays pennies on the dollar, and the hospital eats the costs of provided care as well.

Then you come around with your real health insurance, and the hospital is forced to make you pay for all the money they ate on the first two examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
The problem is you're not always comparing apples to apples. "exact same work" is kind of vague.

The person with the more expensive surgery may have been simply been sicker (co-morbidities) or required a more intensive procedure. A PTCA for one coronary artery with a plain metal stent is going to cost far less then a combined multi coronary artery CABG/PTCA with the newer drug eluting stents on a guy with poor lung function requiring a full heart-lung machines set up and the staff to run it all.
Sort of like the auto body repair shop, eh? Not every rear end collision is exactly the same, the circumstances which led to the collision and type of damage is different, and the cars are different, etc... Then let's change things by requiring the auto body shop to fix every car that comes thru their doors, no matter what level of insurance or ability to pay, that their customers have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
The problem is you're not always comparing apples to apples. "exact same work" is kind of vague.

The person with the more expensive surgery may have been simply been sicker (co-morbidities) or required a more intensive procedure. A PTCA for one coronary artery with a plain metal stent is going to cost far less then a combined multi coronary artery CABG/PTCA with the newer drug eluting stents on a guy with poor lung function requiring a full heart-lung machines set up and the staff to run it all.
He didn't link the costs so we can't see itemized billing figures.

Be that as it may, it's well known the "Chargemaster" has some kooky pricing.

Especially when you look at over-the-counter products.

Reality: a box of gauze dressing billed to you from the hospital (the good ole Chargemaster) can run 5X the amount the same box at Walmart goes for.

I think I'll go in and get my tonsils out for fun. I'll research all the supplies I need and machines for the procedure. Then I'll ask the nurse at the front desk if I can simply rent the room, doctor, and nurses for the surgery.

Yep, I smell a viral Youtube video.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:34 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,474,425 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
He didn't link the costs so we can't see itemized billing figures.

Be that as it may, it's well known the "Chargemaster" has some kooky pricing.

Especially when you look at over-the-counter products.

Reality: a box of gauze dressing billed to you from the hospital (the good ole Chargemaster) can run 5X the amount the same box at Walmart goes for.

I think I'll go in and get my tonsils out for fun. I'll research all the supplies I need and machines for the procedure. Then I'll ask the nurse at the front desk if I can simply rent the room, doctor, and nurses for the surgery.

Yep, I smell a viral Youtube video.
Many of these outrageous itemizations are for display purposes only. Merely to show whomever they need to show just how severe are their 'write offs'. Most hospitalizations are paid for by diagnosis, or by procedure. And the prices actually paid are lower than full price, and include whatever incidentals are needed, like gauze.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Many of these outrageous itemizations are for display purposes only. Merely to show whomever they need to show just how severe are their 'write offs'. Most hospitalizations are paid for by diagnosis, or by procedure. And the prices actually paid are lower than full price, and include whatever incidentals are needed, like gauze.
I've heard this before and chuckle.

You do realize this fraud? And when those bills are sent out it's mail fraud?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 10:57 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,474,425 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
I've heard this before and chuckle.

You do realize this fraud? And when those bills are sent out it's mail fraud?
Sue the dang hospitals then, this has been going on for the 35 years I've worked at hospitals!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Sue the dang hospitals then, this has been going on for the 35 years I've worked at hospitals!
Ok! Lol. (Look for my body at the bottom of the L.A. River once I do so )

Just saying it's fraud. And mail fraud once the post office processes the material.

"Display purposes only" is not how a legit venture runs its books.

Don't you agree this is immoral?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2014, 11:08 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortoggie View Post
The latest data about hospital charges came out last week. In our area, which has ten hospitals the charges for the same procedure varies greatly. In one case a heart procedure was $ 73,000.00 more than the exact same work thirty miles away. There is no rhyme nor reason as to what hospitals charge. This data was for 2012 and I think we lay people should track these reports and write letters to the editor and let the health care crooks know that we are watching and that one day we will find a way to stop their run away thievery.

Treating the uninsured is expensive, the costs need to be absorbed somewhere.

...where have you been?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top