Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should black americans be given reparations?
Yes 6 3.85%
No 150 96.15%
Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:20 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,372,141 times
Reputation: 1569

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern man View Post
I found this on the web.

"Of the first five presidents, four owned slaves. All four of these owned slaves while they were president.

Of the next five presidents (#6-10), four owned slaves. Only two of them owned slaves while they were president.

Of the next five presidents (#11-15), two owned slaves. Both of these two owned slaves while they were president.

Of the next three presidents (#16-18) two owned slaves. neither of them owned slaves while serving as president.

The last president to own slaves while in office was the twelfth president, Zachary Taylor (1849-1850).

The last president to own slaves at all was the eighteenth president, Ulysses S. Grant (1869-1877).

So twelve of our presidents owned slaves and eight of them owned slaves while serving as president."

So just possibly it was legal
I said aren't, present tense.
I'm aware that this used to be legal. Lots of things USED to be legal which aren't. The Salem Witch trials come to mind.
Why would we pay reparations for something most people recognize as a horrendous injustice that was practiced on a national scale?

 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,753,334 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
Would of those of us who had ancestors who fought for the Union get some sort of profit-sharing from the reparations since their lives were at risk earning that freedom?
I have often thought of this, my ggg grandfather fought at Gettysburg for the north.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceofreazon View Post
Why should they or more accurately, their descendents be? Human beings aren't "legally owned property"

If abortion is legal today, then slaves were legally owned then.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:39 PM
 
Location: mainland but born oahu
6,657 posts, read 7,756,825 times
Reputation: 3137
To make the argument that slavery was 5 generations old and no one is alive who experienced it is kind of closed minded. Can we honestly say that those actions made by some ancestors, had no effect on the generations that came after? If we can prove that, then we have no morale or ethical responsibility to fix it. But unfortunately like most issues relatted to U.S behavior in the past, the opposition argument is more of an argument for not being responsible for human rights violations and setting them right vs we are generally sorry and will try hard to make sure human rights violations wont happen in the future, i say this because all one has to do is go back in U.S history after slavery and watch how we as a country continues to violate other peoples human rights. Native Americans, Hawaiians, Minorities etc upto current times.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,392,645 times
Reputation: 8672
Reparations is just stupid, lazy talk.

I didn't own slaves, my father, nor his father owned slaves. Everyone alive today was born free, no more slaves.

This country is supposed to be great because with a lot of hard work, and a little luck, anyone can make it. Thats still true, but people don't want to do the hard work part, without guaranteed good luck.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:58 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiian by heart View Post
To make the argument that slavery was 5 generations old and no one is alive who experienced it is kind of closed minded. Can we honestly say that those actions made by some ancestors, had no effect on the generations that came after? If we can prove that, then we have no morale or ethical responsibility to fix it. But unfortunately like most issues relatted to U.S behavior in the past, the opposition argument is more of an argument for not being responsible for human rights violations and setting them right vs we are generally sorry and will try hard to make sure human rights violations wont happen in the future, i say this because all one has to do is go back in U.S history after slavery and watch how we as a country continues to violate other peoples human rights. Native Americans, Hawaiians, Minorities etc upto current times.
We can say that once the person who would have received the reparations is sufficiently distant from the current person, then reparations would be so minor that the cost of providing them outweighs any benefit.

lets say that the victim of slavery was owed 1,000,000 (all dollars in todays dollars) for it. Generation #2 of 2 kids get 10K each. (people tend to spend windfalls that aren't extremely large-and a million doesn't come close). Generation #3 gets $100, #4? $10-probably far less.

maybe a big mac by the time we hit generation #5.

The person who had the harm deserves the money, NOT their children. Course im not a big fan of inheritance determining peoples success in life.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,536,396 times
Reputation: 2363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
I have often thought of this, my ggg grandfather fought at Gettysburg for the north.
We'd have to set up some sort of sliding scale. Was your GGGGF wounded? Did he really, really, really like Black people (extra money for that one). Now to be fair, your GGGGF will probably get some money taken away because he probably used the "N" word sometimes. Who knows, it might be a wash.

Are you sufficiently sorry for all of White people's sins? Can you self flagellate yourself over the horrors that happened in this country? You might be able to get a few percentage points back that way, but it'll be hard to tell.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,792,616 times
Reputation: 2587
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
There's no case for reparations. No one who was a victim of legal slavery is still around. How many generations removed from slavery are we, four or five, minimally?
You might want to read Robert Blockman's Slavery By Another Name then reconsider your evaluation.

In fact, people of African descent were singled out and persecuted al over America post Reconstruction, from the forced labor practices of the South, to the discrimination yea exclusion all over the North. I'm sure there are a few fundamentalist Christians around who still talk about the mark of Cain.

White America does not deserve a free pass for the systematic oppression of those of African descent which occurred through maybe 1980 or so.
 
Old 06-17-2014, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,536,396 times
Reputation: 2363
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
You might want to read Robert Blockman's Slavery By Another Name then reconsider your evaluation.

In fact, people of African descent were singled out and persecuted al over America post Reconstruction, from the forced labor practices of the South, to the discrimination yea exclusion all over the North. I'm sure there are a few fundamentalist Christians around who still talk about the mark of Cain.

White America does not deserve a free pass for the systematic oppression of those of African descent which occurred through maybe 1980 or so.
So if a black is born after 1980 they get no reparations? Now we're getting somewhere. Who pays and how much?
 
Old 06-17-2014, 03:30 PM
 
15,856 posts, read 14,483,585 times
Reputation: 11948
Now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceofreazon View Post
Human beings aren't "legally owned property"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top