Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"The process of science, when properly applied, attempts to disprove ideas".
And when people do precisely that, concerning AGW, you go berserk calling them 'anti-science'.
Some days the cognitive dissonance is so strong around here one starts to doubt humanity's near term future as well.
That is EXACTLY CORRECT
The cornerstone of science is to DISPROVE THE NULL HYPOTHESIS. Liberal idiots have the basic principle of science backwards.
In the "science" of liberalism, one makes an outrageous contention and states that it is true of no one can disprove it! This is global warming. It is the same as my contending that there is a city of gonmes in the center of the earth. As you cannot disprove it, it must be true!
I am continually shocked by the idiot liberals who do not seem to understand this very basic principle of science, yet claim the "highground" of science. Oddly these individuals have no scientific background whatsoever, have never published in the literature (probably never read an actual journal), never edited scientific papers, and have no clue as to what constitutes a valid scientific analysis.
It is another example of the Dunning-Krueger effect.
Any data that refutes "global warming" is immediately refuted by the global warming crowd, as they are a cult that stands firmly against the principles of science.
The denier's problem is that there is no data that refutes global warming.....If there were you wouldn't keep hiding it.
The denier's problem is that there is no data that refutes global warming.....If there were you wouldn't keep hiding it.
And you have no facts to back up your bad theories. All we keep hearing is some apocalyptic message or other that if we don't return to the caves and stop creating heat, the earth will burn to a crisp.
His issue is humans are bad because humans are creating all the climate problems.
As he (sanspeur) types on a computer which to manufacture causes all sorts of negative impact on the environment.
I guess he's like Al Gore. It's ok to fly everywhere on a private jet and leave your car running for an hour in a parking lot to keep it cool just as long as you are telling others not to do it.
When you take samples from locations where you have no idea what the history is there will always be issues. You work your best to do the best you can and you take many samples (which they have done) in many different locations...that error decreases. Welcome to science 101 you should have learned in middle school.
Get a middle school text book about doing experiments and it will explain this issue.
It's not a nail in the coffin, it's another person didn't pay well enough attention in school and waves their ignorance around like a champions flag.
Of course, but only if they prove your shaky theory. Ignore the ones that don't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.