Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-30-2014, 05:24 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,519,895 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRS1989 View Post
The intention was to cover low income families (mainly single mothers and their children). Low income childless adults were excluded from the program. This exclusion had the effect of incentivizing irresponsible childbearing.

Also, the cut off for Medicaid is very low (33% of poverty for some adults), which incentivizes people to work less because if they move up the income ladder only slightly, they'll lose their health benefits.

Didn't Reagan say we couldn't afford a safety net for the working poor?
Quick reply to this message

 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top