Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg
For me, the conundrum is personal - given that a contract has been breached, what is the right thing to do about it? Having watched and participated in a few legal proceedings in my time, I have come to the conclusion that just because you have the grounds to sue, doesn't mean that a suit is the best response to the breach.
I don't think political correctness has a thing to do with it. The women say they love their child, and I see no reason to doubt their sincerity. I believe that there have been incidences of sperm banks doing a poor job of screening, so some parent winds up with a child with a disability. In that case, I think it is clearly the right thing to sue, because a disabled child can need a lot of money, and why shouldn't the sperm bank pay for their mistake? In this case, though, I think there are good reasons not to sue. As someone upthread mentioned, how would you explain to the child? Because sooner or later, you know the kid will find out.
I have no definite opinion here. Just musing on the question of whether a lawsuit is the best response to their problem. The story does not say whether the bank is accepting responsibility or offering this couple anything.
|
That was my first thought after reading this. That kid will find out, and no matter how you try to explain it, it's going to affect that kid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey
Well, she might have a case for a lawsuit, but I don't see why she would pursue it. After all, the child is her's. She's virtually neglecting her daughter. Get over it, and be a mother.
|
It's "hers". There is no apostrophe there. (The overuse of apostrophes these days is driving me nuts.)
She does have a case, but I agree, why pursue it...but not for the same reason you question.