Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2014, 04:47 PM
 
63,382 posts, read 29,437,443 times
Reputation: 18762

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Look up the term 'in the majority' and see if you can understand it.
Maybe you can try to understand that the poster I replied said "seniors vote Republican", period! That simply isn't true. Please also provide proof that the majority do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2014, 04:50 PM
 
328 posts, read 437,138 times
Reputation: 262
Those who voted for this looney bin deserve what they are getting.

For every 1 job he faked to create 11 people have went on welfare.

He hates whites, hard working Americans, old people or anyone other then himself unless you can help him and his agenda he hates you.

Hoping the new congress can stop him in his miserable tracks of destroying America like he said he would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,400 posts, read 26,427,147 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
It was passed. That is what we should be looking at.

Many retirees worked for that benefit and paid in and that benefit could be cut as much as 60%. Is this all about democrat and republican. no!.. Obama could have vetoed the bill and put an end to it but he doesn't care much for old people.. that is apparent.
Is Obama cutting food stamps, or welfare by 60%?

You started off blaming Obama, this is a bipartisan bill that he approved, still waiting to hear what the option was for an underfunded plan. It does not impact those already retired only the soon to retire. We have heard this same story over and over with various public pension funds, if someone stole from the funds lets go after them but there is little doubt they did not pay in what they are getting out. Two choices, either the tax payer make up for the shortfall or some of the pensioners take a hit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,874,346 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Obama wouldn't cut welfare or foodstamps. His socialist agenda wouldn't fit .

It is the workers in this country that he dislikes. Obama doesn't care for capitalism just communism and social justice for the poor..

The social justice is to make the worker poor and the takers rich. That is his wealth distribution at work.
The last thing King Obummer would ever do is cut food stamps AKA welfare.
President Obama signs $8.7 billion food stamp cut into law | MSNBC

See? OMG, WRONG LINK. Let me find something on Townhall that says that isn't real or something.

I mentioned pensions back in 2011. Guess Obama finally got cracking.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...sing-44-a.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 04:57 PM
 
63,382 posts, read 29,437,443 times
Reputation: 18762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You started off blaming Obama, this is a bipartisan bill that he approved, still waiting to hear what the option was for an underfunded plan. It does not impact those already retired only the soon to retire. We have heard this same story over and over with various public pension funds, if someone stole from the funds lets go after them but there is little doubt they did not pay in what they are getting out. Two choices, either the tax payer make up for the shortfall or some of the pensioners take a hit.
I guess you didn't read the law then. It does state that it will impact those already retired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,730,550 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You started off blaming Obama, this is a bipartisan bill that he approved, still waiting to hear what the option was for an underfunded plan. It does not impact those already retired only the soon to retire. We have heard this same story over and over with various public pension funds, if someone stole from the funds lets go after them but there is little doubt they did not pay in what they are getting out. Two choices, either the tax payer make up for the shortfall or some of the pensioners take a hit.
Oh yes it does affect those already retired and receiving benefits.
That's what makes this a big deal. The cuts can be applied to those already retired up to 79 years old.

Imagine having been retired for 20 years and then having your pension cut 60% ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,730,550 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
The last thing King Obummer would ever do is cut food stamps AKA welfare.
President Obama signs $8.7 billion food stamp cut into law | MSNBC

See? OMG, WRONG LINK. Let me find something on Townhall that says that isn't real or something.

I mentioned pensions back in 2011. Guess Obama finally got cracking.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...sing-44-a.html
Spot on 70Ford. I like your last post in that thread..."I see dots."

The PBGC reports annually to Congress.
The multi-employer pensions in question are union pensions.
They have gone from 100% funded to about 40% funded in a mere 10-12 years.
It's all right there in their annual report.

And nothing was done about it. Premiums that employers pay were not increased. The unions did nothing to reform their pension plans.

Now they are about to hit the wall of "OMG we have no more money" and who has to pay..the retirees with cut benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2014, 05:18 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,966 posts, read 47,838,784 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
LOL..good catch.
So the unions want to cut retirement benefits for those up to 80 years old already receiving benefits.
And they got Congress to ok it.

Another FINE example of government taking care of its citizens ...LOL.
No, the pension companies want to cut them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2014, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,730,550 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No, the pension companies want to cut them.
As they say...follow the money. The unions pushed this change, not the pension investment companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2014, 06:45 AM
 
336 posts, read 380,258 times
Reputation: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
As they say...follow the money. The unions pushed this change, not the pension investment companies.
This particular change was opposed by unions. That said, I agree that past union opposition to benefit cuts helped to put us in the position where we are now (and may necessitate greater cuts). Unions have a long history of taking short-sighted views on various issues. To some degree, this reflects human nature; individuals tend to concern themselves with the present and may dismiss or minimize longer-term problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top