Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2014, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330

Advertisements

Carbon dioxide emissions help tropical rainforests grow faster: Study shows trees absorb more greenhouse gas than expected

Nasa study shows tropical forests absorb 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 a year.
Rainforests absorb more than half of CO2 taken up by vegetation globally.
Scientists previously believed tropical forests emitted carbon dioxide.
Researchers claim their findings emphasise the need to protect rainforests from deforestation to help counteract human greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more: Carbon dioxide emissions help tropical rainforests grow faster: Study shows trees absorb more greenhouse gas than expected | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2014, 08:52 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,457,656 times
Reputation: 4243
Everything with these so-called "scientists" turns out to be "far more than expected" or "far less than expected". It seems they know absolutely nothing about climate change and are just guessing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,175,972 times
Reputation: 4233
Plants absorb CO2 and emit O2. I would expect the more we emit, the better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Everything with these so-called "scientists" turns out to be "far more than expected" or "far less than expected". It seems they know absolutely nothing about climate change and are just guessing.
But that does not stop them from working on climate change models. That's how they get paid. They get paid to develop models, not to be correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:44 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,457,656 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
But that does not stop them from working on climate change models. That's how they get paid. They get paid to develop models, not to be correct.
Absolutely!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
How many global warming threads does the OP start each day? Why exactly don't we have a subforum here for global warming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
How many global warming threads does the OP start each day? Why exactly don't we have a subforum here for global warming?
You should learn to read. This isn't about global warming. It's about the benefits of man made CO2. Please try to keep up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 09:58 AM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993
Hope we can get the straight scoop on this, I was just on the way out to the barn to put catalytic converters on the a**'es of my cows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,551,149 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaten_Drinker View Post
Plants absorb CO2 and emit O2. I would expect the more we emit, the better.
Only if there are enough trees. Deforestation has resulted in our CO2 buffer zone being compromised. The solution is to replant the forests we've destroyed. That will allow the planet to absorb the CO2 already in the atmosphere. I've been puzzling over why people keep talking about reducing the CO2 footprint (not a bad idea if done preemptively but we have to process the CO2 we've already released to have an impact here) when large forests are capable of processing massive amounts of CO2. It's not our increased CO2 production that is the problem. Deforestation is a bigger problem.

Yes the rain forests can absorb the CO2 IF they are large enough. Unfortunately, we keep cutting them down. If you want to get rid of a massive amount of CO2 then plant a massive number of large trees and let them grow. We need our forests back. Particularly our rain forests because they grow the fastest and, hence, can absorb more CO2 than other types of forests.

I do believe we have a CO2 problem but I don't think it's emission that is the problem. I think we've rendered the planet incapable of processing CO2 through deforestation. Unfortunately, there is no money in replanting the forests so no one talks about it. There is money to be made in reducing CO2 through technology and money to be made chopping down the rain forests to plant the land so that's what we do. We put a bandaid on a severed vein and ignore that we're still bleeding. The real issue is deforestation not CO2 emissions. If the rain forests are large enough they can absorb the CO2. They are not large enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 10:17 AM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,180,419 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
How many global warming threads does the OP start each day? Why exactly don't we have a subforum here for global warming?
This

In a typical week, there will be 2-3 threads on climate change. The bulk of them are about why someone feels it's all BS (it's cold in my city right now etc), but sometimes they're about why someone thinks it's real (98% of scientists etc). I have found that the people that buy into climate change on CD are often new posters of people that have never participated in a debate about it. The one's that cal BS are the same 15-20 people in every thread. This subject has basically turned into a left vs right thing, which is sad because science shouldn't be a left vs right thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top