Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-02-2015, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,290,309 times
Reputation: 16109

Advertisements

I'm not sure what to think of net neutrality either. I understand the argument that netflix should pay more when they use 25% of internet bandwidth, but would that really result in us, the consumer, having lower prices as a result? Netflix would pass on the cost to us by charging more for a subscription but would the ISPs really lower prices or increase speeds? I doubt it. Most of them have monopolies on their local communities anyways. As long as they can continue to monopolize the local cable provider game I support net neutrality in theory.. should be able to access any website and internet should act like a medium to provide access to the sites, with no throttling or censoring in any way.

I don't want to be paying for ala carte internet .. I'd rather just pay for the set amount of bandwidth like is done today... 250GB is plenty for me.. though it would not be if I had a wife and 2 kids.

It's only cricket wireless and their crazy high bandwidth caps that have allowed me to put extra leverage on my local cable provider to deal or I would cancel and just have mobile internet which I value more than home internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2015, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
All I can say is this issue has genuinely confused me. I really don't know whether it was a good ruling or not.

I just wish we had more than a couple internet providers so this wouldn't be an issue.
There is a plethora of ISPs. And if you don't like the physical cable provider you can go satellite or mobile broadband.

Verizon's coverage is excellent. I'm out in the middle of nowhere and I have choices.
AT&T is catching up though and are now in my area as well.

The issue is not choice if ISP..the issue is with content providers who all want to hog the internet with their HD streaming and not lag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2015, 04:02 PM
 
4,738 posts, read 4,435,394 times
Reputation: 2485
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
There is a plethora of ISPs.
50% of the Broadband in the United States is under comcast control, more of it if/when they get a hold of TWC.

67% of Americans have 2 or less choices regarding broadband in their area (FCC 2013)

so maybe the "plethora" only applies to the remaining 30 some odd percent who have broadband not gobbled up by one of these companies. lets stop pretending there is competition in this space. . .it really just speaks to being uninformed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And if you don't like the physical cable provider you can go satellite or mobile broadband. Verizon's coverage is excellent.
1 - Verizon is not a "home broadband provider" sure their speeds are decent enough these days (in most places) but they price the service in a way that makes it impossible. 100 gigabyte plan is $700 per MONTH. Seriously. .that is competition?

2 - Satellite has decent enough "downloads" but no real upload capability. Therefore. . it really sucks. No one with true broadband would find it acceptable, including the FCC (Sattelite upload speeds not high enough to be classified as broadband).



Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm out in the middle of nowhere and I have choices.AT&T is catching up though and are now in my area as well.
your personal internet choices aren't really part of the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The issue is not choice if ISP..the issue is with content providers who all want to hog the internet with their HD streaming and not lag.
really?

So what, I pay for 30, 50, or 150mbps down speeds. . .and if I use 4mbps or even 7mbps of that 50 on a netflix stream. . i'm Hogging?

Plus - yeah, no. If I want to use 50mbps down downloading my latest video game OR watching 5 streams in HD of netflix thats my choice. If Comcast didn't like it, they shouldn't offer a 50mbs down tier

The issue remains not the size of the lanes or comcast/isp capability to provide fast internet speed, or even the amount of interconnects. The truth is its a smokescreen that Verizon and Comcast want you to believe so you support them making netflix more expensive, so you buy their services instead.

Maybe start listening to some tech shows, or podcasts, because you have no idea how the infrastructure works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2015, 04:06 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,846,248 times
Reputation: 17241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking
It's Obamanet's fault. Defund the FCC.
It probably IS Obama's doing!!!

Anything to extract MORE $$$$$$$$$$!! (This country is the GREEDIEST in the world)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2015, 04:06 PM
 
4,738 posts, read 4,435,394 times
Reputation: 2485
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockwiz View Post
I'm not sure what to think of net neutrality either. I understand the argument that netflix should pay more when they use 25% of internet bandwidth, but would that really result in us, the consumer, having lower prices as a result?
I call huge amount of BULL#@!! on that

Why is netflix such a large part of bandwidth? Because you the customer are ReQUESTING it


Okay, why? because you like it

How, because you bought a pipe from Comcast that says you get XYZ speed.

You shouldn't have to pay again (Via netflix or comcast) just because your friends and you all like the same site

you paid once for that connection to netflix, its done



The reality is. . .Comcast and others don't WANT you going to netflix. They know you don't have a choice on Broadband provider. . so they can F' over your netflix connection until netflix pays $$$. . even though YOU ALREADY PAID for that connection.

What a scam
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2015, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Dallas
1,006 posts, read 735,662 times
Reputation: 1232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post
I call huge amount of BULL#@!! on that

Why is netflix such a large part of bandwidth? Because you the customer are ReQUESTING it


Okay, why? because you like it

How, because you bought a pipe from Comcast that says you get XYZ speed.

You shouldn't have to pay again (Via netflix or comcast) just because your friends and you all like the same site

you paid once for that connection to netflix, its done



The reality is. . .Comcast and others don't WANT you going to netflix. They know you don't have a choice on Broadband provider. . so they can F' over your netflix connection until netflix pays $$$. . even though YOU ALREADY PAID for that connection.

What a scam
Same femtocell double-dipping bullsh%t everyone has forgotten about. It scares me how short the average American memory is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2015, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post
1 - Verizon is not a "home broadband provider" sure their speeds are decent enough these days (in most places) but they price the service in a way that makes it impossible. 100 gigabyte plan is $700 per MONTH. Seriously. .that is competition?

2 - Satellite has decent enough "downloads" but no real upload capability. Therefore. . it really sucks. No one with true broadband would find it acceptable, including the FCC (Sattelite upload speeds not high enough to be classified as broadband).
You eat up 100GB of data a month ?

I'm on the 10GB plan and some months have leftover.
And I do watch TV and movies on the internet.
It's actually more solid than the DSL I was on in my previous place.

What I don't do is stream 24/7 though.

There are plenty of folks happy with satellite because of the little they do on the internet.
How many "consumers" really upload ? They do email, peruse a few internet sites and maybe watch a movie or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2015, 04:57 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,707,908 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockwiz View Post
I'm not sure what to think of net neutrality either. I understand the argument that netflix should pay more when they use 25% of internet bandwidth, but would that really result in us, the consumer, having lower prices as a result? Netflix would pass on the cost to us by charging more for a subscription but would the ISPs really lower prices or increase speeds? I doubt it.
Why would Netflix pass on the cost to me? I don't use their streaming service.

I'm being a little punchy. But it highlights the point. The problem with the system is that there is a disconnect between price and value. This disconnect is the result of a broken marketplace scenario, perpetuated by consumer irrationality. In a nutshell, if the world was right and good, people would pay for Internet service by the bit perhaps with different pricing based on current network traffic - just like electricity and water is priced in many areas, with higher prices for usage during peak hours, and of course higher costs for higher levels of consumption.

There is no way for service providers to switch to such metered service without being the victim of a PR bloodbath. That's why the system is broken and shall remain so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post
You shouldn't have to pay again
I already paid for my car - why should I have to pay for each gallon of gasoline? /SARC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2015, 05:09 AM
 
Location: Mountain Home, ID
1,956 posts, read 3,636,534 times
Reputation: 2435
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
You eat up 100GB of data a month ?

I'm on the 10GB plan and some months have leftover.
And I do watch TV and movies on the internet.
It's actually more solid than the DSL I was on in my previous place.

What I don't do is stream 24/7 though.

There are plenty of folks happy with satellite because of the little they do on the internet.
How many "consumers" really upload ? They do email, peruse a few internet sites and maybe watch a movie or two.
I don't buy the "plenty of people are happy with satellite uploads" or the "I only need 10GB and so should you" argument. It's like saying just because you and some other people drive one mile to work who needs a car with a gas tank larger than one gallon? Just because you and a bunch of old people who barely use the internet don't need it doesn't mean no one else does either.

Plenty of people need decent upload speeds. Have you checked how many videos are on YouTube lately? The site gets 300 hours of video uploaded every minute. I recently took some 1080p videos on my smartphone and uploaded them. They were about five minutes long and ran about 400MB in size. Do you know how long ONE of them would have taken to upload on a satellite connection?

I got a digital copy of Assassin's Creed Unity free when I bought my Xbox One. Downloading a single game slurped up over 39GB of data. Hell, when I turned the console on yesterday it downloaded an update that was 2GB in size.

The only way to make Verizon Wireless into a decent home internet option for the average person is if they go out and buy a line with a grandfathered unlimited internet feature. Verizon stopped offering it about seven years ago and the going rate to take over an existing line that still has it is anywhere between $600 and $1,000. And you have to pass a credit check. And they don't allow upgrades on those lines so you have to pay for a new device out of pocket. And they're sneaky bastards and will try to trick you into making changes to your plan that will automatically drop the feature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2015, 06:52 AM
 
59,089 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Actually, technical innovation was thriving before and after divestiture. Most of the excess "innovation" since then has been in marketing, packaging, and distribution. But you can go ahead and persist in a delusion with regard to something you have no personal knowledge of. What else is new?

Thanks for confirming you had a remarkably limited view of the innovation that went on in the labs, and therefore you're basically spewing nonsense from ignorance.
Keep believing your drivel.

After I left Ma bell I was blown away at ALL the new technology we DIDN'T have under Ma Bell.

When you live in a vacuum, you have NO idea what the rest of the world has out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top