Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They have a republican Governor... But no way in hell will vote for a Republican President?
31 v. 19 is all the proof you need to see the nation is trending conservative.
Should I book mark this post so when the 2016 election happens and the Democrats win the presidential election, we can then discuss your math later.
This email scandal is going to blow up in the Republicans' face for pushing it. It's going to make them look petty and stupid. Moderates and swing voters will actually be more apt to support Clinton because they will see through this transparent attempt at scandal-mongering (if this remembered by any but a tiny minority of yahoo extremists) come election time.
You heard it here first CD.
Lots of other absurd nonsense from the left is posted here, too.
I have to say, even as a person who usually aligns liberally on most every social issue... this whole "it was convenient" excuse is bull****. Really? It was so much more convenient for you to go to the trouble of setting up entire email server/infrastructure on your property than to just use government-provided email for your job? Not buying it, not stupid.
Even if nothing nefarious is going on, it just looks dodgy as hell, and you'd think a career politician bent on a presidential run would have had the brains to anticipate the consequences of doing something as shady as this while in a senior cabinet position.
And whatever you think of her, she's no dummy and probably did have the brains to anticipate this... which suggests that she must have perceived a damn good reason (one she has not publicly disclosed) to go to the extra trouble.
you mean to tell me you don't find any problem with a high government official representing the U.S.A. and dealing with other countries and foreigners having their own private server and deciding for themselves which emails to turn over and which ones to destroy and we should just take her word for it?
Especially when the Clinton Foundation gets millions of dollars from foreigners.....you don't have a problem with that?
this isn't a personal matter, this is official government misconduct and the arrogance of her that she won't turn over her server for the FBI to look into it.
you are those low information voters that will vote for Hillary no matter what.
What is even more strange is that someone who "claims" to be a Christian will vote for such a person? How can you have no moral backbone and claim to be a Christian? Must be some left wing, wishy washy, no moral standard, pick and chose what you want to believe type of christianity.
This email scandal is going to blow up in the Republicans' face for pushing it. It's going to make them look petty and stupid. Moderates and swing voters will actually be more apt to support Clinton because they will see through this transparent attempt at scandal-mongering (if this remembered by any but a tiny minority of yahoo extremists) come election time.
You heard it here first CD.
What a Clintbot!
The Associated Press is not buying her falsehoods in case you haven't noticed.
All they have to do is get the ISP's backup and they have it all.
Hillary used a service and the service has everything.
They are only dragging this out with "Hillary won't turn over..." and Congress crying to the State Dept.
Just subpoena the ISP and they get it all.
Or just ask the NSA because they have it all as well.
Incorrect, the ISP's wouldnt log the emails, since the ISP wasnt used as the email server.
The "service" was only for things like spam filtering etc.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.