Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This country elected Barrack Obama president (twice), not because he was best qualified, but because of his race. It's almost like we were trying to prove something to ourselves, such as racism is no longer widespread in this country. Now I fear we are about to do the same thing again... elect our first woman president based more on gender than whether she is the right person for the job. I sincerely hope the last 8 years has taught us a lesson as voters. Electing Hillary Clinton president would be a bigger mistake than the one we made in '08.
This country elected Barrack Obama president (twice), not because he was best qualified, but because of his race. It's almost like we were trying to prove something to ourselves, such as racism is no longer widespread in this country. Now I fear we are about to do the same thing again... elect our first woman president based more on gender than whether she is the right person for the job. I sincerely hope the last 8 years has taught us a lesson as voters. Electing Hillary Clinton president would be a bigger mistake than the one we made in '08.
Simply because she was secretary of state so she already has on the job experience and established relations with world leaders.
Reagan had no "experience with foreign leaders", yet knew how to negotiate in Americas best interest. Then again he had executive experience having been a successful governor for two terms.
Just because Hillary shook hands with a bunch of foreign leaders(many of whom wont even be in office when the 2016 president is inaugurated in 2017), doesn't mean much of anything. Rest assured some of those leaders she met and had tea with laughed behind her back once she left the room.
I get a kick out of people who say because someone held a particular job, that alone qualifies them to be president. What if you do a lousy job as SoS, does that still mean you have foreign affairs experience?
If I did a lousy job as a doctors assistant, does that mean I am ready to be the head of UCLA Medical Center?
Lets face it, she did nothing of any significance, and actually screwed things up more than anything else.
Yet rest assured the koolaid drinkers like this ;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53
President Hillary Clinton. YES!
will point to her being SoS, therefore she is qualified.
Yet ask these same partisan ideologies if they feel the same way about people like Kissinger or Bolton, and they would vomit.
They cannot see the forest for the trees, but hopefully the majority of educated people will come out to vote and not be fooled by the lies Hillary will be telling the next 16 months.
This country elected Barrack Obama president (twice)... but because of his race.
Did you do a national survey of those who voted for him as President to arrive at this conclusion or did you just make it up? Or maybe that's why you voted for him and you are projecting onto others.
I can think of NOTHING WORSE for this country than Hillary as POTUS......Obama said she would be great at the job??? PLEASE consider the source than!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Amen!
