Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will the Supreme Court rule that gay and lesbian couples have a right to legally wed?
SCOTUS will rule AGAINST legalizing same sex marriage 38 18.91%
SCOTUS will rule FOR legalizing same sex marriage 163 81.09%
Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2015, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,470,127 times
Reputation: 4777

Advertisements

In favor of. Not a doubt in my mind.

 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Phila & NYC
4,783 posts, read 3,301,646 times
Reputation: 1953
Not making a prediction but there is a third option not indicated in the poll for this thread.

"The court could hold that it is unconstitutional to deny LGBT couples all the rights and privileges of marriage without requiring states to allow them to marry," UCLA law professor Adam Winkler told me.
A ruling like that would likely compel states to pass laws allowing "civil unions" for gays — as Vermont did in 2000, when it granted gay couples the benefits of marriage without calling their union marriage.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/suprem...144720736.html
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Florida
9,569 posts, read 5,628,150 times
Reputation: 12025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Oh Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will without question vote against it, so it will be some type of split decision.
Well we saw how the USSC voted today on the ACA 6-3 and I expect the same outcome on Same Sex Marriage as well but I could be wrong.
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way
335 posts, read 376,861 times
Reputation: 527
They will give states the right to decide as they should. obama is liar
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way
335 posts, read 376,861 times
Reputation: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Okay, say it is a choice. You or no one else have the right to oppress people from what they want to do with their lives (Also known as mind your damn business). No one's committing a crime by getting married.

they dont deserve marriage for sick deviant behavior.
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,758,293 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickdoo View Post
they dont deserve marriage for sick deviant behavior.
Hmmm, I was married once. I never had to get myself certified as "deserving" marriage, based on anyone's opinion of my previous behavior. Have things changed in the past 40 years?
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzy jeff View Post
Not making a prediction but there is a third option not indicated in the poll for this thread.

"The court could hold that it is unconstitutional to deny LGBT couples all the rights and privileges of marriage without requiring states to allow them to marry," UCLA law professor Adam Winkler told me.
A ruling like that would likely compel states to pass laws allowing "civil unions" for gays — as Vermont did in 2000, when it granted gay couples the benefits of marriage without calling their union marriage.


Yahoo!
The only problem with that idea is the supreme court has only 2 questions before it.
1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?
2) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state?

Neither question says anything about civil unions. They specifically say marriage.
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
2,572 posts, read 4,253,312 times
Reputation: 2427
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickdoo View Post
They will give states the right to decide as they should. obama is liar
Your world is getting smaller everyday, soon even you will be a relic of the past.
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:55 PM
 
Location: From Denver, CO to Hong Kong China
900 posts, read 375,821 times
Reputation: 389
Recalling that the Federation does not recognize the existence of the civil union, then it can not grant federal rights to this institution.
 
Old 06-25-2015, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Tip of the Sphere. Just the tip.
4,540 posts, read 2,770,332 times
Reputation: 5277
I've thought for some time that the SCOTUS will make a split ruling. I think they'll rule that:

1. States do NOT have to marry same sex couples- it will be left to their own state legislatures, courts, etc. to decide that. However it will be specified that legislation directly banning SSM is unconstitutional... ensuring that this will be slowly worked out through each state court system except perhaps Mississippi which could hold out forever.

2. States however DO have to recognize any and all legal marriages performed by other states.


So the net effect will be that the haters can still hate in their own states. They can do all the political posturing they like as state courts one by one rule in favor of same sex marriage (except for Mississippi... though perhaps they'll allow first cousin marriage?). Meanwhile, gay people will be free to take a drive across the state line and get married as they like. Now don't get me wrong- that will be BULL****- gay people will still be treated as second class citizens in that respect. But that's by design- as it will provide fodder for lawsuits into perpetuity... or until each state allows same sex marriage (except perhaps Mississippi, where the gay couple must also be siblings?).

This way the SCOTUS will attempt to avoid the outcome of Roe v. Wade where the decision is fought over for decades to come. Forcing state courts to settle the matter one by one should make the whole issue less contentious in the long run... or at least I think that'll be the plan.

What do ya'll think?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top