Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The editors of the New York Times believe Europe has a duty to accept millions more Africans.
Quote:
Europe’s border security agency,
Frontex, says that between 500,000 and one million migrants are massed in Libya
waiting to set forth for Europe, compared to the 170,000 who arrived in Europe
by sea last year. But those figures have been challenged, and in any case the
argument that Europe simply can’t afford to take in any more migrants from the
Middle East and Africa is also suspect: Turkey has taken in 1.7 million Syrians;
Lebanon another 1.2 million
Africa has more than a billion people now and is projected to have 4 billion by the end of the century. I wonder how many of those the NYT would like to see living in Europe. Is South Africa the demographic model they envision for Europe's future?
Barry and co. effectively got rid of the leader of North Africa's most prosperous and stable country when Gaddafi tried to set up a continental, Pan-African, commodities-based currency.
Globalists intend wage-dilution, and clash of civilizations, and polyglot, and chaos, and stirring of unrest, and one world currency, and collectivism, and feudalism.
The ultimate goal of the dark occultists behind these activities is the literal enslavement of humankind.
This commissioned fresco triptych, by the artist Benjamin F. Long, is a permanent fixture in the headquarters lobby of the Bank of America in Charlotte, NC:
If any duty exists, it's with Africa and other places on Earth where civilization has yet to make it's first appearance to stop breeding like cockroaches and flooding into those societies where man has actually risen above the slime of the swamp. Same for Central America. Europe cannot become a dumping ground for the sludge of Africa, just as the US cannot take and support infinite numbers of Mexican, Guatamalans, and others from SoB. No obligation exists for the civilized world to support the byproducts of the recreational reproductive activities of savages.
If any duty exists, it's with Africa and other places on Earth where civilization has yet to make it's first appearance to stop breeding like cockroaches and flooding into those societies where man has actually risen above the slime of the swamp. Same for Central America. Europe cannot become a dumping ground for the sludge of Africa, just as the US cannot take and support infinite numbers of Mexican, Guatamalans, and others from SoB. No obligation exists for the civilized world to support the byproducts of the recreational reproductive activities of savages.
Exactly! When people try to go abroad for a better life it is either something is wrong in their country or they are just trying for a better life and take a risk.
We moved over here from Europe and the responsibility to be safe and doing it in a legal way was on us, nobody else.
Among these immigrants are many criminals and terrorist and who wants them and how to figure out who is who!
I think Europe is poised to take LESS immigrants, not more in the near future.
Europe has a youth unemployment rate of 25-40% +++ in some countries.
By what stretch of the imagination does anyone think Europe can provide for these "migrants?"
When the migrants get to Europe, there is no work for them and they simply become wards of the state. Sorry, "migrants," head to the oil rich Gulf Arab states who can put you to work in the oil fields.
One of the main contributors to the rabid antisemitism in Austria and Germany c.1880-1923 was the mass migration of Jews from Eastern Europe to the central European cities.
It seems the Left in modern day Europe is determined to recreate the conditions for another Holocaust, this time involving muslims.
Last edited by Goinback2011; 04-20-2015 at 07:11 AM..
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- About 13% of the world's adults -- or about 630 million
people -- say they would like to leave their country and move somewhere else
permanently.
It's probably much higher than 13% of Africans. Even if Europe were to expand legal immigration from Africa dramatically it would still be a drop in the bucket compared to the total number who want to go. So they would still try to come illegally by boat.
Barry and co. effectively got rid of the leader of North Africa's most prosperous and stable country when Gaddafi tried to set up a continental, Pan-African, commodities-based currency.
Globalists intend wage-dilution, and clash of civilizations, and polyglot, and chaos, and stirring of unrest, and one world currency, and collectivism, and feudalism.
The ultimate goal of the dark occultists behind these activities is the literal enslavement of humankind.
. The disconnect between EU bureaucracy and the European people will greatly increase due to this matter. Yet more friction in the system. Hilarity ensues.
. I'm not sure what you do, as a practical matter, when 1500 Africans show up at an Italian port in an old freighter (shades of Raspail, of course). Repatriating is a tough job and the last thing you want to do is set up huge refugee camps all over your country, which soon become permanent shanty towns. My temptation would be to throw some water and food on board, and immediately tow the ship back to it's last port of call.
. The population explosion in Africa is one of the most underreported issues in current years. Just look at the expected population in Nigeria over the next few decades and you get to see a slow rolling disaster.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.