Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And as you also know, he has had some very significant Supreme Court victories.
Funny how Booosh was a tyrant and needed to be impeached, for his use of executive overreach, but when Obama continues those same practices, and even broadens them, suddenly the dems are fine with them.
The Obama admin either committed them outright, or he supported these unconstitutional overreaches, or he vigorously continued these practices from a prior administration, or one of his three-letter administrative agencies was engaged in it's own overreach.
Why was he involved in the Martin, Brown and Grey case then? Why the SC shooting as well? Those were local cases.
Exactly. Those cases would allow Obama to have good liberal talking points. Why let a good tragedy go to waste?
This case on the other hand, would highlight the fact that Obama has released tens of thousands of illegal immigrants with criminal convictions back into the US general population out of prison/detention. In this case, Obama is part of the tragedy.
There is bias in Obama's selectivity of what cases he elevates to speak on. Anyone who can't see that Obama deliberately speaks out on some local cases, but not others based on politics is a sheep.
why would the president have anything to do with a local murder? its not part of his job.
I made the correction for you:
"Why would the president have anything to do with a local murder that doesn't stir up racial conflict or sell votes to the clueless liberals? Its not part of his job!"
Yeah, the president is using his skin color to his advantage. Thanks to his Democratic shills, the opposition is too cowed to do anything for fear of being called "racist". This didn't happen when Bill Clinton was president. Why? He was white.
We'd have to go all the way back to 1830 under the six month presidency of James Garfield, to have a president with fewer vetos than Obama. Awe, the poor guy is receiving such an insane level of partisan opposition from the Republicans is historic. <sniff, sniff>
Funny how Booosh was a tyrant and needed to be impeached, for his use of executive overreach, but when Obama continues those same practices, and even broadens them, suddenly the dems are fine with them.
The Obama admin either committed them outright, or he supported these unconstitutional overreaches, or he vigorously continued these practices from a prior administration, or one of his three-letter administrative agencies was engaged in it's own overreach.
Funny how so many of those things that the right likes to tout as losses for Obama (they claim 13 decisions went 9-0 in the Supreme Court against him) were cases that were begun under the previous administration and the decisions on those issues only finally came down during Obama's tenure, so they are really the previous administration's losses for that administration's executive overreach. And funny how there were no threads here by Conservatives loudly lambasting that administration for those practices.
So was Robert "KKK" Byrd, by the Democrats. He was third in line to succeed to the Presidency in 2010, all because Democrats made him the highest ranking member of the Senate behind Vice President Joe Biden.
Which has exactlly what to do with McConnell stating he wanted the president to fail, and then leading his party in that effort? Oh, that' right, absolutely nothing.
Geesh, at least try to be a little creative when you are blatently attempting to deflect the conversation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
