Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And to hell with the facts, right? In FACT, the man responsible for the videos has said - that particular clip was from a MISCARRIAGE. He thought it was ok to use because it 'showed what a fetus would look like at that stage."
Watch some news, would you? It's not like he's never been interviewed.
So, women who oppose Planned Parenthood and abortion are self-hating or brainwashed - the female equivalent of an Uncle Tom or house Negro?
Yup, because the only reason that someone opposes abortion is because of misogyny, not protecting the unborn. Its a massive extreme right-wing conspiracy by men to control women and their bodies and a movement by people who are terribly racist, but for some reason condemn an act that eliminates far more minorities than whites
The mental hoops one must jump through to stereotype pro-lifers must be exhausting.
Really? And you have some proof? What is it? Perhaps you should contact the authorities who say they are still trying to find a motive. What do you know that they don't?
This is the responsibility that Republicans and conservatives take for these domestic terrorist acts influenced by hateful, propagandist rhetoric from right wingers:
Echoing the Leftist media, huh? The videos are as authentic as any video could be, with Planned Parenthood Dr. Nucatola sitting at lunch, drinking wine and discussing the sale of fetal body parts with the video's producers. How much more authentic could that be?
Only those who have never watched the video might be tempted to claim they are "fraudulent." You? Have you chosen not to watch them?
Truth is hard to accept, isn't it? So, keep spreading the propaganda that is based on a lie.
This is like Hillary claiming that the Benghazi attack was because of a video, even though everybody knows it wasn't.
Where then are the indictments, as selling organs or body parts is clearly against the law? After all, according to you, we have the clear evidence of this crime right in those videos you saw.
Insensitive comments is not a crime, still waiting for the source of the video in Fiorina's claim because they have not divulged where it came from but it wasn't PP.
they did say- a woman lost her child and video taped it- she was interviewed and it was her personal tape
Where then are the indictments, as selling organs or body parts is clearly against the law? After all, according to you, we have the clear evidence of this crime right in those videos you saw.
people want to live what they want-- even through facts are in front of them - there are NO body parts there is no indictment- there is no law breaking no insurance fraud- NADA
You mean this one? [vimeo]140972629[/vimeo] https://vimeo.com/140972629 Below the video is an in-depth description of the video(s) Fiorina was referring to as well as where the video(s) originated.
not originated there-- it was all debunked later with interviews of the mom and the producer of the video- he stole it-
Defunding Planned Parenthood has an affect on poor women. I'm not sure how this is being lost on people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem
Are you sayin' Obamacare failed them?
Poor women are eligible for Medicaid and Obamacare expanded Medicaid (in the non-ideological states that chose to expand Medicaid). Planned Parenthood accepts Medicaid as payment.
What makes you think it wasn't from Planned Parenthood? Who said it wasn't, Planned Parenthood?
I guess you fell for the deceptive technique used in that video which is splicing in a video image of something unrelated to the narrative, leading the viewer to believe that the speaker is talking about the image seen on the video.
Quote:
O’Donnell described holding the fetus, and at the nine-minute mark of the video, a photograph of a fetus is shown. While viewers may be led to believe the photograph depicts an aborted fetus, the photograph is actually of a fetus that was delivered prematurely at 19 weeks of gestation.
Alexis Fretz, a Pennsylvania-based photographer, published the photo as part of a series on her professional website and described the experience of her premature delivery of her son, Walter Joshua, in a blog post. It is unknown if the Fretz family granted CMP permission to use the photograph.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
