Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2016, 06:58 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,221,410 times
Reputation: 5240

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
You are another example of someone who is low information on anything being discussed in this thread, and who represents the easy hordes of people who don't care about details, that inflammatory media articles intend to coral.


In many of not most jurisdictions, throwing beer in someone's face, or whatever else you were planning on, is assault and you and they should be arrested and booked for such should any such action occur. Having an assault on your record is not a trivial matter.


assault is not as bad as you would think, battery is what you are thinking about. also, anyone that believes that rape should be legal is just a POS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2016, 07:01 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,221,410 times
Reputation: 5240
yes I understand that he has the freedom to say what he wants with his free speech, but as soon as he acts upon what he preaches, then he is nothing but a dirt bag rapist that should have his family jewels chopped off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,571 posts, read 37,194,916 times
Reputation: 14027
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
yes I understand that he has the freedom to say what he wants with his free speech, but as soon as he acts upon what he preaches, then he is nothing but a dirt bag rapist that should have his family jewels chopped off.
He has bragged about raping a woman when he was in Iceland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,824,882 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
He's not white and probably not Christian, therefore feminists agree that it is all right for him to believe in rape.

Multicultural enrichment.
Guy clams to be a practicing Muslim.

Traditional views that wives were property of their husbands predates ISLAM and crosses all religious ideology.

Up to the mid 70's all 50 states included a common exception, marital rape. Took 17 years for all 50 states to address marital rape. Opposistion came primarily from Christian leaders. Even then, 20 states have a very narrow view of marital rape and limit it to a man having sex with his wife while she is unconscious.

There is no shortage of Christians who believe a woman is required to submit to her husband.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,824,882 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
assault is not as bad as you would think, battery is what you are thinking about. also, anyone that believes that rape should be legal is just a POS.
Assault/ Sexual Assault has a variety of definitions and no two countries ( or states for that matter) define or count it the same way.

This guy is a part of the neo masculine movement, predators who prey on men willing to pay them to learn how to get laid, their right as men.

Some of the message is " makeover". Men are encouraged to get a job, move out of their parents' basements, bathe, work out, eat healthy, dress well, get their hair styled, develop social skills and read social q's with the goal of getting laid.

And in some cases, some of these guys promote a male birth right and " no means yes" ideology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 09:40 AM
 
19,718 posts, read 12,289,701 times
Reputation: 26555
It's a few guys that post to a men's self-improvement website meeting up locally for beers. It's got nothing to do with rape. That one article was a thought experiment and not to be taken seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 10:00 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,521,794 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Precisely why the "non-religious;" i.e., atheists, are destructive to society, and should not be trusted. It is religion that forms the foundation of a civil society, especially the Christian religion. No free government can be permanent "where the public worship of God, and the support of religion, constitute no part of the policy or duty of the state in any assignable shape." — Judge Joseph Story, justice of the SCOTUS, appointed by James Madison, and served 34 years.

Horse pucky! Religion has caused way more acrimony than it has ever prevented. An appointed supreme justice is going to be your benchmark? Seriously?

You and a host of others have confused man's inherent desire to treat others as they would desire to be treated themselves as some "religious edict" only imperative when it is a dictate of some sky daddy or other.

Newborn toddlers, never having set foot in any church or heard any religious nonsense, get along together just fine until they begin getting indoctrinated with crappola from their elders, who might by happenstance, be quite religious.

The world would be a much better place without all of this phony 'supreme being' nonsense. It totally belies and undermines, of far more ethical foundation, "all men are created equal".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 10:09 AM
 
20,730 posts, read 19,400,813 times
Reputation: 8296
Yeah I am sure there is a catch from the author of

Compliment and Cuddle.



He is trolling and the feminists take the bait. You cannot have a sense of humour and be a feminist today.

He also may in fact have a point. Since we do not have a coherent culture anymore, which has agreed upon social norms to communicate an invitation to sex, we need objectivity that the rest of society can understand. Otherwise we will waste billions on he said she said in court. Sex in the entire animal world is a dance often with subtleties . We used to have marriage that made the explicit agreement. Now its a free for all. What to one person is an invitation isn't to another. So he is using a Farrakhan strategy to gain attention that women are being treated as if they have no agency at this point. The biggest conflict in the law is that women can be "raped" and then drive home only to be arrested for drunk driving on her way home.

Last edited by gwynedd1; 02-03-2016 at 10:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 10:14 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,345,559 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
What a load of cow dung.
Your opinion, but never the opinion of the framers of the Constitution of the United States. Atheists have even been barred from testifying in courts because their testimony would be untrustworthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2016, 10:22 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,345,559 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Horse pucky! Religion has caused way more acrimony than it has ever prevented. An appointed supreme justice is going to be your benchmark? Seriously?

You and a host of others have confused man's inherent desire to treat others as they would desire to be treated themselves as some "religious edict" only imperative when it is a dictate of some sky daddy or other.

Newborn toddlers, never having set foot in any church or heard any religious nonsense, get along together just fine until they begin getting indoctrinated with crappola from their elders, who might by happenstance, be quite religious.

The world would be a much better place without all of this phony 'supreme being' nonsense. It totally belies and undermines, of far more ethical foundation, "all men are created equal".
Man has no such "inherent desire." Man is inherently sinful.

Obviously, you have never had children, either.

Without religion, a strong belief in a righteous God, man would have no code of ethics, or sense of right and wrong. Morals come from a religious foundation, based on the Judeo-Christian religion.

And please don't point to Islam, which is an evil cult, a false religion, that does not believe in the God of scriptures. Just because they say they do, does not make it true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top