Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-06-2016, 12:32 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,123,991 times
Reputation: 2037

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Private sector? Why didn't the Federal Reserve create $2 trillion in QE to buy private sector MBS? They only bought GSE (Fannie and Freddie) MBS with that $2 trillion in QE. $2 trillion artificially pumped into the economy devaluing the dollar and reducing lower-income and middle class buying power because those off the hook weren't making their mortgage payments and instead were pumping artificially gained wealth into the economy.

Are you aware that tens of thousands of homeowners are 5+ years behind on their mortgage payments and will get their homes for free because the statute of limitations has run out on foreclosures?

Home Free, as 5-Year Clock Expires:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/30/bu...ires.html?_r=0

That's Fannie's and Freddie's fault for buying Clinton era HUD-mandated "Affordable Lending" loans made to people who never should have qualified, not the private sector's fault.
We already determined how everyone dropped the ball. Remember how dishonest you were being with the SEC pdf? Where the private regulators were fined for their wrong doing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2016, 12:38 PM
 
18,420 posts, read 19,036,217 times
Reputation: 15711
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
If they were, they wouldn't have violated both the 10th and 14th Amendments with this ruling.

Furthermore, SCOTUS isn't infallible. Even SCOTUS rulings have been overturned, subsequently.
when you can muster a legal argument that wasn't already put in front of the court, the fact remains the law was struck down. your point was dismissed out of hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:13 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,654,477 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post

Dead women's blood on your hands, hothulamaui. Revel in it...
My goodness! I come back to this thread and learn that hothulamaui is a Supreme Court Justice!

Whodathunk?

I'm honored to be on the same site as a member of the SCOTUS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:23 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,654,477 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Cite the U.S. vasectomy and abortion statistics side by side.

Vasectomy: Zero deaths, ever.
Abortion: 10 deaths in just 2011, alone.

Nearly 80% of abortions are surgical procedures, and women's deaths have been reported as a result of complications of legally performed abortions (CDC tracks that).

Given those facts, there's no way anyone can legitimately argue that ambulatory surgery center medical and facilities standards aren't necessary for facilities performing SURGICAL abortions...

unless they're OK with needlessly killing women.

We can all see in this thread who falls in that latter category.
I wonder if hospitals are considered surgery centers? Surgeries ARE done in hospitals, are they not?

In 2010, the Office of Inspector General for Health and Human Services said that bad hospital care contributed to the deaths of 180,000 patients in Medicare alone in a given year.

Now comes a study in the current issue of the Journal of Patient Safety that says the numbers may be much higher — between 210,000 and 440,000 patients each year who go to the hospital for care suffer some type of preventable harm that contributes to their death, the study says.

That would make medical errors the third-leading cause of death in America, behind heart disease, which is the first, and cancer, which is second.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,321 posts, read 26,245,816 times
Reputation: 15654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
My goodness! I come back to this thread and learn that hothulamaui is a Supreme Court Justice!

Whodathunk?

I'm honored to be on the same site as a member of the SCOTUS!
You are confused, she isn't the one arguing that SCOTUS missed the obvious violation of the 10th & 14th Amendment, all that talent and they pure out missed it according the league leading poster on this thread.
Bunch of dummies, how did they pass the bar exam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:36 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,654,477 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You are confused, she isn't the one arguing that SCOTUS missed the obvious violation of the 10th & 14th Amendment, all that talent and they pure out missed it according the league leading poster on this thread.
Bunch of dummies, how did they pass the bar exam.
No, I was commenting on informedconsent's post that hothulamaui has blood on her hands because of the SCOTUS ruling. The only way that could be true is if hothula is a SC justice.

My post was sarcasm. I should have used the () symbol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:40 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,898,651 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Cite the U.S. vasectomy and abortion statistics side by side.

Vasectomy: Zero deaths, ever.
Abortion: 10 deaths in just 2011, alone.

[
Worldwide, though, there have been deaths from vasectomy.

Since you are insistent that women should receive ambulatory surgical center standard care on the very remote possibility of complications, and since complications can arise as the result of vasectomies, shouldn't men receive the same ambulatory surgical center standard of care? Otherwise, are you consigning men to second-class status, and to death?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,221,070 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
  • 78.1% of all reported abortions in 2012 were accomplished by surgical procedure: curettage (which includes dilation and evacuation). Most curettage abortions are suction procedures.
  • Medical abortions made up 21.9% of all abortions reported in 2012.
Latest published CDC data (November 27, 2015): Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2012


As the vast majority of abortions are surgical procedures, ambulatory surgery standards ARE necessary. The SCOTUS ruling sets a horrible legal precedent that it's OK to provide substandard health care to women.
And yet doctors can perform a D&C in office WITHOUT admitting privileges or surgical center requirements as long as it is for a miscarriage.

SAME procedure. Different rules.
I wonder why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 02:04 PM
 
2,813 posts, read 2,115,120 times
Reputation: 6129
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Look at the link I posted. Nearly 80% are classified as curettage (surgery), and only about 20% are classified as medical (prescription medication).

Even the UCSF link you posted states curettage abortion is a surgical procedure.
This is different procedure from surgery. Curettage is routinely preformed at doctor's offices.

Much like getting your wisdom teeth out is a "surgical procedure" but not one that usually needs to be done in
a "surgery center".

Do you see the difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2016, 02:31 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
We already determined how everyone dropped the ball. Remember how dishonest you were being with the SEC pdf? Where the private regulators were fined for their wrong doing?
What wrongdoing? There was no wrongdoing. Remember the SEC findings on the ratings agencies?
Quote:
"There is no requirement that a rating agency verify the information contained in RMBS loan portfolios presented to it for rating. Additionally, rating agencies are not required to insist that issuers perform due diligence, and they are not required to obtain reports concerning the level of due diligence performed by issuers.

...The [SEC] Staff notes that each rating agency publicly disclosed that it did not engage in any due diligence or otherwise seek to verify the accuracy or quality of the loan data underlying the RMBS pools they rated during the review period. Each rating agency’s “Code of Conduct” (available on each rating agency’s website) clearly stated that it was under no obligation to perform, and did not perform, due diligence. Each also noted that the assignment of a rating is not a guarantee of the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information relied on in connection with the rating."
https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/200...tion070808.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top