what the Alt-Right actually is (women, arguments, Americans, liberals)

[gwynedd1]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

Because I said I find a lack of empathy to be disgusting?

Explain.

No.

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by gwynedd1

No.

Because you realized how stupid your comment was?

I have empathy for the disabled. I respect people. Unlike some on the alt-right.

[gwynedd1]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

Because you realized how stupid your comment was?

No

I have empathy for the disabled. I respect people. Unlike some on the alt-right.

I would say you have a good deal of neediness.

[GregW]

The Alt-right should remember that when the point a finger at someone three of their fingers are pointing right back at themselves.


Their fundamental problem is they cannot compete and win a fair competition so they want to have the game fixed in there favor before it starts.

[gwynedd1]

Originally Posted by GregW

The Alt-right should remember that when the point a finger at someone three of their fingers are pointing right back at themselves.


Their fundamental problem is they cannot compete and win a fair competition so they want to have the game fixed in there favor before it starts.

Lame. I know you can do better than this. What's your point?

[green_mariner]

I have nothing to gain and everything to lose when it comes to the Alt-right.

[GregW]

My point is simple. Most of the Alt-right are decidedly inferior to many of the people they are fighting against. Simply believing that racial differences exceed the range of variance in human capacity is proof of the Alt-right does not see clearly and operated under the fog of fear that somebody actually is superior to them.

[philkirkham]

Originally Posted by GregW

My point is simple. Most of the Alt-right are decidedly inferior to many of the people they are fighting against. Simply believing that racial differences exceed the range of variance in human capacity is proof of the Alt-right does not see clearly and operated under the fog of fear that somebody actually is superior to them.

Heh, I first read that as the 'frog of fear'

[SeasonedNewbie]

I've no words for what I think of the OP's post, so I'll explain it the best way I can with visuals:



Too bad there isn't a "WTF" smiley on this forum, because that's also what I'm thinking about OP's post and this thread.

[gwynedd1]

Originally Posted by GregW

My point is simple. Most of the Alt-right are decidedly inferior to many of the people they are fighting against. Simply believing that racial differences exceed the range of variance in human capacity is proof of the Alt-right does not see clearly and operated under the fog of fear that somebody actually is superior to them.

So you just decided to double down and offer another opinion?

I really don't even know where to begin with you. Firstly the argument is not even over what is innate. Racial correlations exist without even getting into innateness. When people , in the alt-right" , do get into innateness they usually at least try to cite studies. Then we have the left, inconsistent to the last unspecific gender, argue gays and lesbians are innate. Again you are so eerily similar to social conservatives that argued gays and lesbians were choosing to be homosexual. The left constantly lies about race. "blacks" can't be racists. They ignore its statistical impossible to have that much West African dominance in sprinting. They ignore Asians , all while accusing "whites" of rigging it.

Even YEC believe in natural selection and those people are morons. To not believe in selective principles and variability with a species is just beyond all comprehension . I cannot take such idiotic concepts seriously. I guess that's why they are all shocked, shocked I tell you , we have super weeds and super bugs that we have bred into existence.


What I know beyond a doubt is the problem is you consider it taboo. That's the reason. You are just a social conservative in another church.