Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary is "right" (neo-con) on economics and globalism but left on social issues. In other words, she's the worst from both sides rolled into one. And the showstopper is she's the most dishonest and corrupt politician ever seen.
Sadly, this really is the problem with the bloated one. She truly is the worst of both sides, and I think that's why voters perceive her to be both incredibly unlikable and untrustworthy. The fact that she is the most dishonest, corrupt, and unethical politician the United States has ever seen makes her a horrible choice.
Americans are not an informed electorate. If they were, Hillary Clinton would be routed in every election she was a part of.
Sadly, this really is the problem with the bloated one. She truly is the worst of both sides, and I think that's why voters perceive her to be both incredibly unlikable and untrustworthy. The fact that she is the most dishonest, corrupt, and unethical politician the United States has ever seen makes her a horrible choice.
Americans are not an informed electorate. If they were, Hillary Clinton would be routed in every election she was a part of.
I agree. Sometime I think though those voting for Hillary aren't so much uninformed but want a more evil of two lessors.
Does anyone really think there will be any unity under Hillary Clinton? :roll eyes:
The Democrats have had EIGHT YEARS. We are more divided than ever
The problem of division is exaggerated, mainly by the media, which is a more significant contributed to the division that the president is. In reality, it's pretty much idiotic to believe either candidate could really restore "unity," whatever the **** that even means. Donald is intentionally divisive (gets him airtime; again, the main issue is the media) and Clinton is just generally despised even by Democrats. She had to enlist Bernie to unify her own damn party. But given that neither candidate talks about media bias in any meaningful way, if you think the country will be united under one of these, I wish your parents had worn a condom so I didn't have to deal with someone so ****ing stupid.
They are saying Hilary has already won. Early voting turnout in Florida has basically garaunteed her the state and trump can't win without it.
Please, FL isnt even close to being able to be called one way or the other. Its a long shot but Trump could win without FL anyways if he needed. MI and PA together would pretty close to seal the deal for him. Or just one of the above(especially PA)plus every swing state but FL would put him around even with Clinton.
Democrats and Hillary have been playing divisive group identity politics, Muh Women! Latinos! AA and BLM!, and scapegoating whites this whole time and now that she is about to win from doing it, she's all about unity?
Does anyone believe the lying crap that constantly comes from her?
The only unity Hillary has is with other globalist politicians and her donors.
Trump offers freedom, Hillary offers more government dependence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
