Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2017, 02:44 AM
 
2,407 posts, read 1,505,461 times
Reputation: 1453

Advertisements

After all, according to revealed documents, Hillary's campaign purposefully WANTED Trump to go up against Hillary thinking she'd cruise into the white house, and then the DNC were actively undermining Bernie Sanders's campaign.

You could argue that your party caused Trump to win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2017, 02:48 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,235,353 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
After all, according to revealed documents, Hillary's campaign purposefully WANTED Trump to go up against Hillary thinking she'd cruise into the white house, and then the DNC were actively undermining Bernie Sanders's campaign.

You could argue that your party caused Trump to win.

That would be a very stupid argument over the much more obvious fact that a bunch of idiots voted in a buffoon.

But many of us reckon democracy is not perfect. It leaves room for morons to be voted into offices.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 02:57 AM
 
2,407 posts, read 1,505,461 times
Reputation: 1453
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
That would be a very stupid argument over the much more obvious fact that a bunch of idiots voted in a buffoon.

But many of us reckon democracy is not perfect. It leaves room for morons to be voted into offices.
.
It's not a stupid argument at all. Hillary Clinton WANTED to go up against Trump, Cruz, or Carson, thinking these candidates would be unpalatable to the public... or had you not heard of the leaked email?

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status...042240?lang=en
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:05 AM
 
13 posts, read 5,665 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
That would be a very stupid argument over the much more obvious fact that a bunch of idiots voted in a buffoon.

But many of us reckon democracy is not perfect. It leaves room for morons to be voted into offices.
.
Bunch of idiots huh? Trump has done more in a few days than OBama did in years....Oh wait what matters to you people is,gay rights umhm this is something that really matters,ban guns,they love their rights but don't dare ask to keep our rights 2nd,dont get what they want so we burn riot lute and destroy personal property.


Think some who has been a man for how many ever years wants to be a woman now should have the right to use a womans bathroom ,yeah I want that sick freak near my daughter.

Last edited by CaseyB; 01-25-2017 at 05:15 AM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:08 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,235,353 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
It's not a stupid argument at all. Hillary Clinton WANTED to go up against Trump, Cruz, or Carson, thinking these candidates would be unpalatable to the public... or had you not heard of the leaked email?

What you said has absolutely no relevance. None. Zero.

It doesn't make any sort of difference who Hillary preferred to go up against. But I don't expect a dittohead to understand logic. Hence, we get stupid arguments like yours.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:17 AM
 
2,407 posts, read 1,505,461 times
Reputation: 1453
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
What you said has absolutely no relevance. None. Zero.

It doesn't make any sort of difference who Hillary preferred to go up against. But I don't expect a dittohead to understand logic. Hence, we get stupid arguments like yours.
.
So you've already insulted me by calling me an idiot, dittohead (whatever that is), and claiming my arguments are stupid.

You're not part of the "Love Trumps Hate" crowd, are you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:28 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
That would be a very stupid argument over the much more obvious fact that a bunch of idiots voted in a buffoon.

But many of us reckon democracy is not perfect. It leaves room for morons to be voted into offices.
.
A bunch of idiots....


That would be 63 million strong there, buddy.
Maybe you democrats were the idiots for making Hillary the nominee.
What do you think about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 06:39 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,090,374 times
Reputation: 5927
Arrow Democratic party is splitting into two

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
So you've already insulted me by calling me an idiot, dittohead (whatever that is), and claiming my arguments are stupid.

You're not part of the "Love Trumps Hate" crowd, are you?
Dittoheads are Rush listeners who is reporting that the nasty women's march ( their words, not mine) is an example of the imploding democratic party. The vitriol and vulgar language doesn't represent most democrats and the result will be a party split between normal democrats and those that OPENLY support BLM and violent protests.

Democrats have a choice. Follow the "vulgar and nasty" crowd or move to more moderate platform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 06:52 AM
 
1,160 posts, read 713,249 times
Reputation: 1346
the general consensus is that democrats support their party no matter who's running or what they do. However, that is not true considering Trump won over many democrats in order to easily re-take what had become "blue states".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 06:57 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,090,374 times
Reputation: 5927
Arrow Which side are most democrats in party splitting?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Domitian View Post
the general consensus is that democrats support their party no matter who's running or what they do. However, that is not true considering Trump won over many democrats in order to easily re-take what had become "blue states".
So even moderate democrats have a breaking point. The democrats that did not vote for Hillary are probably not supportive of the angry protests, BLM, and violence that is supportive by Elizabeth Web, Bernie, and Hollywood elites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top