Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743

Advertisements

Quote:
WHEREFORE, Petitioners and other members of the proposed class pray that this Court grant the following relief:

(1) Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus requiring Respondents to release Petitioners and other members of the proposed class forthwith;

(2) Issue an injunction ordering Respondents not to detain any individual solely on the basis of the EO;

(3) Enter a judgment declaring that Respondents’ detention of Petitioners and other members of the proposed class is and will be unauthorized by statute and contrary to law;

(4) Award Petitioners and other members of the proposed class reasonable costs and attorney’s fees; and

(5) Grant any other and further relief that this Court may deem fit and proper.

Judge Ann Donnelly of the US District Court in Brooklyn granted a request from the ACLU to stay deportations of those detained on entry to the United States following President Trump's executive order.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...ff41baa27256It only applies to those were detained. The rest of the Executive Order is still in full force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamadiddle View Post
More reason for Trump to make his Supreme Court pick ASAP in case these challenges float upward.
Not all SC judges have sworn loyalty to Gump. This kind of ruling could well be 9-0 against Trump.

I still have faith in the system, and I know the SC is not as partisan as some would like it to be. It is not never meant to be.

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 01-28-2017 at 07:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:29 PM
 
27,657 posts, read 16,147,064 times
Reputation: 19081
FAKE NEWS ALERT> Misleading headline. Mother Jones, who woulda thunk it. Not a muslim ban..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:30 PM
 
13,425 posts, read 9,960,461 times
Reputation: 14358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
It was immensely and profoundly stupid of Trump to make his executive order take effect immediately without warning. There was no reason to strand people at airports and create instant chaos. His E.O. should have said "Effective March 1 ... " Give people time to adjust to the new rules, arrange flights, etc.

Amateur hour at Trump Circus Circus continues...
Yes, that's right. It's completely asinine to let go down this way.

This does not bode well for the future. There are some serious serious consequences that can and will follow from global eff ups of this magnitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Sweet Home Chicago!
6,721 posts, read 6,489,000 times
Reputation: 9915
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Now that the temporary inconveniences are settled, we can turn our attention to the liberal complaints that Saudi and Pakistan were not included. They're right. They should be.
Absolutely, I was disappointed that the ban missed SA and Pakistan. Maybe Trump will phase them in next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:32 PM
 
27,657 posts, read 16,147,064 times
Reputation: 19081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Now that the temporary inconveniences are settled, we can turn our attention to the liberal complaints that Saudi and Pakistan were not included. They're right. They should be.
darned if you do or dont.. wouldnt that be funny. Theyd screatch like a mashed cat either way
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,970,933 times
Reputation: 33185
Good. The judge is doing the thinking Trump should have done in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,966,685 times
Reputation: 6391
Maybe if Islam were a peaceful religion this wouldn't have happened. These critics should have a perspective before jumping into the "xenophobic" and "racist" bandwagons. This also wouldn't have happened if there were tons of Muslims protesting against terrorism, ISIS and all that. I mean, they are protesting, but it's either against Trump or Israel. Lol.

The ban should've included Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. They're more radical than Iraqis and Syrians. In fact, many Iraqi Muslims are moderate, peace-abiding people. Just because ISIS is from there doesn't mean that they're majorly Iraqis (when they are not actually - most ISIS members come from abroad!). So Trump was a bit "off" here and should've done his research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Hartford County, CT
845 posts, read 681,421 times
Reputation: 461
Good. Hopefully this is the start of this stupid order being ruled unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2017, 07:33 PM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,293,931 times
Reputation: 41015
The title of this thread is false and misleading. The Judge granted an emergency stay to temporarily allow detainees with valid current visas to stay. That's it. The judge did nothing regarding his executive order overall. It does not allow new immigrants from countries banned to come in unless they already had visas to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top