Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:11 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,631,426 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

The ends justify the means.

 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:12 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Pocahontas got scalped!! LOL!!
That was AWESOME!
Sit down, shut up and hold on, bich!
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:13 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Why don't liberals criticize E. Warren for breaking the senate rule?

Ithink the question should be why can't the truth about a Senator's past be told on the Senate floor?
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:16 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,576,036 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Why don't liberals criticize E. Warren for breaking the senate rule?

Ithink the question should be why can't the truth about a Senator's past be told on the Senate floor?
Then change the rule first.

I am not sure that was the "truth." Hearsay was what it was.
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:16 AM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,275,187 times
Reputation: 26553
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Why don't liberals criticize E. Warren for breaking the senate rule?

I think the question should be why can't the truth about a Senator's past be told on the Senate floor?
Especially when that Senator is up for Attorney General.

Or do we just not care about facts anymore?
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15654
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
The case was about black people suppressing the vote of OTHER black people, so you are wrong.

Race had nothing to do with it.

Furthermore, Sessions desegregated Alabama schools and prosecuted KKK members.

So many lies from the race-baiting Democrats -- especially the fake Indian Pocahontas.

Go read page 6 of Coretta Kings letter, yes it was all about suppressing the black vote, Sessions went the extra mile of prosecuting black activist rather than those suppressing the black vote.


Quote:
In these investigations, Mr. Sessions, as U.S. Attorney,
exhibited an eagerness to bring to trial and convict three
leaders of the Perry County Civic League including Albert
Turner despite evidence clearly demonstrating their innocence
of any wrongdoing. Furthermore, in initiating the case,
Mr. Sessions ignored allegations of similar behavior by whites,
choosing instead to chill the exercise of the franchise by
blacks by his misguided investigation. In fact, Mr. Sessions
sought to punish older black civil rights activists, advisers
and colleagues of my husband, who had been key figures in
the civil rights movement in the 1960's. These were persons
who, realizing the potential of the absentee vote among
Blacks, had learned to use the process within the bounds of
legality and had taught others to do the same. The only
sin they committed was being too successful in gaining votes.




https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ml#document/p1
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:17 AM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,275,187 times
Reputation: 26553
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Then change the rule first.

I am not sure that was the "truth." Hearsay was what it was.
You do realize it's very scary when people are more attached to rules than to the truth, right?
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Bay View, Milwaukee
2,567 posts, read 5,317,108 times
Reputation: 3673
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Rules don't mean anything anymore or we only need to obey the rules that liberals agree with?
Perhaps because the Republicans themselves apply the rules selectively:

Jeff Merkley reads Coretta Scott King's letter about Jeff Sessions on Senate floor | OregonLive.com

Warren was silenced, but Merkley was allowed to read the letter. Funny how that works.
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:19 AM
 
4,512 posts, read 5,058,283 times
Reputation: 13406
Why don't liberals criticize E. Warren for breaking the senate rule?

You can't pick on a Tribal Chief, come on you racists
 
Old 02-08-2017, 08:19 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
Especially when that Senator is up for Attorney General.

Or do we just not care about facts anymore?

Well, we know there are many quite content with alternate ones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top