Wrong
They have been shown in many instances to have skewed/biased criteria to help declare something fact or fiction on their little meter, depending on the ideological bent. They are based in FL, and have been exposed showing video word for word from (R) politicians compared to their "pants on fire" claims. Any reasonable person, within the context of the claim can see that their skewed perspective frames false narratives to fit a ideological agenda.
But hey, google is your friend, so look up who owns them, and how liberal or conservative their ownership is.
But wait, maybe if you were fed so called "checked facts" from a hard right source, you'd just accept it, right?
I mean if a source called Fact check USA was owned by a company that never once in the last 60 years, endorsed a single Democrat for president, you'd feel totally fine with their impartiality, right?
Well guess what, Politifact is owned by the TBT's, and they have not endorsed a single (R) for president in 60+ years.
That is right, they have endorsed historic losers like MsGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, etc., with out a single exception, but I'm sure that means nothing to you. But if the shoe were on the other foot, rest assured you would feel differently if the "factcheckers" were owned by a conservative media source.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
