Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2017, 06:45 PM
exm
 
3,722 posts, read 1,780,990 times
Reputation: 2849

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilamai View Post
The Retardicans have been crying about Obama for the past 8 years. People can't cry about Trump during his first few months?

Heck, the Retardicans are STILL crying about Obama. lol
Aren't you still crying about Bush?

And are you sure your parents are allowing you to post here? Your choice of words is disturbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2017, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Bellevue & Seal Beach
768 posts, read 718,778 times
Reputation: 1404
Quote:
Originally Posted by atler8 View Post
In fairness I'll level the same "spoiled brat "charge against the early on Tea Partiers who had a hissy fit after Obama won the election in Nov. 2008.
If you take a look at the calendar, you'll see that they voiced their spoiled little tantrums in the earliest vestiges of the Tea Party movement in Feb. of 2009, less than 1 full month after Obama took the oath of office.
See how I did that ?
The tea party formed in protest of out-of-control spending while Obama promised increases in taxes & massive give-a-ways ( Obama phones and money from his stash). This was a true grassroots formation. Everyday citizens were fed up with our country being so irresponsible and at the taxpayers expense. What the Democrats have been so upset about in regards to the tea party is that it just naturally formed. The Democrats are all about how to move their agenda forward. The Democratic politicians are so jealous that this occurred amongst conservative type individuals. That's one of the reasons why they hate the tea party. It would be a dream come true for them if their own followers could do the same. So they're trying to make that happen. The problem is it just happened. Trying to emulate that by the Democrats in office won't be the same thing. They just can't figure out a way around that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2017, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Orange County/Las Vegas
2,544 posts, read 2,737,099 times
Reputation: 2519
arrogance and complacency
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2017, 05:40 PM
 
99 posts, read 44,357 times
Reputation: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Everyone who loses an election (or a series of them, as the left has) is upset, of course. Some grousing and complaining is inevitable, regardless of party. Then they get over it, and life goes on.
Have you considered asking the left why they are upset rather than assuming? Your answer does not fit my feelings at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2017, 05:43 PM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,755,587 times
Reputation: 10408
The Dems have been crying and whining for over 4 months now because no-one will change their messy diapers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2017, 05:44 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,903,758 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
I can shorten that lengthy question of yours down to two words that sum it up completely. DONALD TRUMP.

We don't care that we lost to the GOP, it is WHO we lost to that is our concern. Man has no business anywhere near the WH, both domestically and internationally.
Then it's def in the Dems for picking Hillary. Looking at her losing to a "colored" man in 2008 either says the US ain't really that racist or Hillary was already the worst choice but, the DNC didn't get the hint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2017, 05:56 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,012,426 times
Reputation: 15559
How many people do you think are demonstrating Over six million people voted against trump. Would you say maybe 1,000,000 million -- that would be high right.

Most aren't reacting the way you like to think they are so you can keep up your narrative. But live your dream - it's working for you I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 01:30 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,365,741 times
Reputation: 23858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Everyone who loses an election (or a series of them, as the left has) is upset, of course. Some grousing and complaining is inevitable, regardless of party. Then they get over it, and life goes on.

But the extraordinary screaming, whining, and unceasing hatred coming from the left after they got booted out of every majority in the government, is unprecedented. ...

There are two major reasons the liberals went bonkers when they realized they were losing the Nov. 2016 election in the Presidency and the Congress.

1.) One of them is loss of the opportunity to appoint judges to the Federal bench, including the Supreme Court. ....

2.) The other reason concerned Obamacare and its various unconstitutional features. ...


Trump's election was not only a stunning shock to these people. It was also the major derailing of their plans for the next decade... and beyond.

No wonder the liberals are still screaming, crying, rioting, burning and destroying things. The Trump election - which brought into power someone who clearly understood what they were doing and had no qualms about pointing it out publicly - forced their wished-for socialist utopia into the train wreck they always dreaded.
You are giving the Democratic party far too much credit.

If the party was that smart and that organized, Bush #2 would have never won twice. And Clinton would never have been elected once.

The fact is the Democratic party hasn't been able to organize itself enough to leaver the parking lot ever since 1968. If they were so smart, they would never have lost so many national elections for such a long time.

When party discipline leaves, so does winning. In 1968, the Democratic party discipline just didn't leave, it vaporized. It took the deaths of an entire generation of older voters before the discipline could return, and for all those years, nothing but a lot of very bad habits set in to replace the discipline.

Obama was the only guy in the past 40 years who had the smarts and the vision to truly unite the party and inspire it at the same time.

Until he showed up, the Democrats were what the Republicans became during his 8 years- directionless, lacking unification, and concentrated only on opposing the other guys. All that stuff comes after a bad Presidency. Bush #2 was bad, but he was nothing like Lyndon Johnson's kind of bad. Even Nixon wasn't Johnson's kind of bad, because it didn't take long for Reagan to show up. There was no Reagan for the Democrats for the rest of the 20th century.
Bill Clinton was elected twice, but he was no Reagan. Nixon was elected twice too, and he wasn't Reagan either.

Those things- all the leaderless disarray- are habitual fallbacks in both parties. As soon as things start getting tough in the Democratic party, the leadership reverted to what they knew best how to do- lose. So they lost.

The two points you made are nothing new at all to either party. The winners always nominate SCOTUS judges whenever they can who are favorable to their party.
Scalia wasn't the only justice who ever did his party lotsa favors for decades. He wasn't the first who was so selfish to put himself above his party, either. If he had retired during the best of the Bush years, you wouldn't have even mentioned this replacement thing, but he didn't, and so he died on the job at a bad time for the Republicans.
Big deal. Happens every few decades.

Socialized medicine has been a 2-party issue ever since the end of World War II. Who came up with the plan that could get passed was the party that had the best plan.

And that was the Republicans. Mitt Romney was the very first governor to get a law that insured everyone passed during his single term. Both parties fought against him tooth and nail, but Mitt's plan was basically sound enough and popular enough that it was passed, and it still exists today.

Rant as you will about the ACA. The fact is, now that well over 20 million people who were never insured before are now insured, health care for all, rich, poor, or in the middle, is now seen as a right that all Americans should have. By more folks than those who don't see it this way.

That's exactly how our medicine will be from now on. Get used to it because there's nothing you can say that's gonna make it go away. But it can be made better. Once you jump on that horse, you're riding a winner.

That's because Obama was the Democratic Reagan.

Ronald Reagan's greatest accomplishment was to change the course of the ship of state. He steered our nation in a direction that it has never veered from since. That's something the Republicans often do the best.

Obama gave us all equal medicine. That's something the Democrats often do the best.

Don't expect the GOP to ever come up with a good social program. They can't. It's not in their DNA.
Don't expect the Democrats to always define the United States as a nation to the rest of the world. That's what the Republicans have always done the best. It's not in the Democratic DNA.

Last edited by banjomike; 04-02-2017 at 01:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 01:32 AM
 
Location: USA
5,738 posts, read 5,443,536 times
Reputation: 3669
I don't care about "losing" an election, this is a f****** country we're dealing with, not a football game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 05:39 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,087,690 times
Reputation: 5927
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamies View Post
Because that is what communists do. They riot and start revolutions.
Democrats are tired of losing. Democrats now have watched failing policies affect countless elections yet democrats double down on liberal and fa left platform.

Democrats lost the house.
Democrats lost the senate
Democrats lost the p presidency.
Democrats are about to lose supreme court.
Democrats have less than 19 governorships.

Life in the world of democrats has to be dismal so yes, November 8th was another depressing election for democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top