Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2017, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,894,142 times
Reputation: 14125

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Using a critical & creative thinking approach, considering the circumstances, 'Medicare for All' seems to be the best option available. Arriving at this finding, using a critical & creative thinking strategy, does NOT imply this is a perfect option & has no challenges in re: to implementation, working out the 'kinks' & so forth.

It's simply reality-based as opposed to based on ideological fantasy scenarios or cognitive distortions.

Along those same lines, it would be helpful to discard some of the legal & other fictions - some seem poorly conceived, misguided &/or heading in the wrong direction, for example the syllogism that begins with a fallacious major premise:


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood

Beginning with the major premise that, fr'instance, 'Corporations are people, have the same rights ...' is problematic & is not reality-based. This leads to a plethora of syllogistic fallacies.

Personally, I think some of the 'false premises' 'black/white thinking patterns' (cognitive distortions) & lame fantasy-based ideological schticks need to be countered with reality. Otherwise, it does not appear we as a people will have the desire necessary to make a pragmatic, plausible, possible solution, such as 'Medicare for All,' come into being.
The issue is many think it is going to raise taxes, of course it will. You have to offset "premiums" somehow. The only issue I see is the end of private sector health insurance unless we go to the Part-B model. It will call for fewer agents and secretaries in the health insurance sector.

However this state opt out plan Pence is working on is NOT just THE answer, it should even be an option on a multiple choice test.

I agree on Citizens United.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2017, 09:20 AM
 
716 posts, read 393,312 times
Reputation: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNameIsBellaMia View Post
It's not a matter of how hard it is. It's a matter of getting things done. He can't accomplish this without congress, who are also elected and can be unelected if they fail to cooperate.

I don't blame him one bit. It's time to move on if they won't cooperate. It's just another case of not being able to fix stupid.
Really, why should he be blamed, for promising to repeal Obama care on day one? The supreme deal-maker gave it his best shot for 18 whole days! What else could he possibly do?!? It's not like he's expected to actually lead our nation or our congress.

And I'm absolutely sure Mexico will pay for that wall...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top