Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest
Yeah Hilliary would have never done such a thing
|
I was thinking the same. If I read between the lines of the OP words I heard a Hillary supporter.
The problem is not only the bombing that brings in recruits it is the occupation itself.
There are so many moments in History and movies that have been made about it that we should know by now that no one likes to have their country occupied.
Why are we over there in the ME sending our men and women to die to protect our "allies" to stop terrorists, to ensure the oil keeps flowing?
Imagine if a foreign power invaded America to topple our President and his cabinet... oh wait we already have a Civil War brewing over that... but if say North Korean troops landed in California and started a march on DC the armed public would fight back.
We really can't blame the fighters in the ME for hating America and it should not be a wonder how they are able to refill their ranks with fresh volunteers whenever we kill them.
Bombing certainly sends a message and our technology tells our enemies that there are few places they can hide but it is no way to win a war.
There are atrocities happening to people all over the world yet we choose to spend millions of dollars to blow up some sand in the middle east.
There has to be a better way to fight terrorism.