Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think he's an idiot just like most on the left who like to use labels. "Well, Pakistan voted for a female, therefore, all females are good enough to be president."
Libs continue to fail to comprehend that gender or race doesn't matter, it's the individual that matters. Maybe the Pakistani leader had good ideas and plans for the country. Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't call half of her country "a basket of deplorables". Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't tell some of the people that she was definitely going to make sure their jobs never came back (coal miners). Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't laugh hysterically about Ghaddaffi getting a knife shoved up his backside and killed. Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't work for Israel and want to overthrow several countries in the ME. Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't support rapists. Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't have a public policy and a private policy. Maybe the Pakistani leader didn't steal the election from her rival during the campaign. Etc.
Hillary and the Pakistan leader both being female doesn't mean a damn thing. It had nothing to do with misogyny, but go ahead left, keep pretending that was the reason. They can keep crying for an additional 4 years.
I doubt if she gained or lost many votes either way. Those who only vote for males are probably 90% Republican voters to start with and those who voted for her because she was a woman are probably 90% Democrat voters to start with.
If we get a great female candidate we will have a woman president. This wasn't the situation this time around. It seems just because we had a first black president now we have to check off the woman box.
Then first hispanic, first gay, first transgender, and so on and so forth. To democrats skin color and sex are the most important qualities.
Maher is an idiot, if he thinks you're supposed to vote gender over substance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo
We had a chance to have a woman a heartbeat away from the Presidency but the liberals killed that. I must admit I would have been praying for McCain's health daily and i don't care much for McCain and aint real religious.
The fact is Hillary was a highly flawed candidate but still got a majority of the votes, hardly a sexist nation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane
If we get a great female candidate we will have a woman president. This wasn't the situation this time around. It seems just because we had a first black president now we have to check off the woman box.
Quote:
Originally Posted by james159
Then first hispanic, first gay, first transgender, and so on and so forth. To democrats skin color and sex are the most important qualities.
Maher is an idiot, if he thinks you're supposed to vote gender over substance.
.
He didn't used to be this ridiculous. This is something he would not have said on his old Politically Incorrect show when he was more libertarian/right. Maybe he is just yapping to appease his younger progressive viewers and keep up ratings.
Obviously he and other lefties would not be so excited if the female candidate was conservative.
Yeah, well, that Pakistani woman president got blown up, so I don't know if Maher really wants to hold that up as something to emulate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
