Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:06 AM
 
12,045 posts, read 6,588,253 times
Reputation: 13985

Advertisements

Pocahontas for 2020 !!
Go for it Dems.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,759,189 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by philopower View Post
I just saw her on Bill Maher and hearing her speak left me riled up and shaken. Like I really have not felt that way in a long time, even Obama didn't excite me like she did and if she can keep that momentum, I'm sure she'll be our next president.
You're kidding, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:28 AM
 
5,286 posts, read 6,226,955 times
Reputation: 3132
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I like Sanders but I've condemned him backing Hillary also. As we see now he would have got all the blame if he hadn't and she lost.

Warren might have made a difference if she would have backed Sanders in the primary. Gabbard did.



Which has nothing to do with my position. So would have Hillary and so did Obama.

After Sanders lost- his voters were left with two viable choices- Clinton or Trump. Except for those whose only issue was changing the status quo and only changing the status quo, Clinton was the candidate closer to Sanders' stands. And he held out support until the DNC moved the party platform closer to his own policies. He got from the situation what there was to be had.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:31 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,979,608 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
Cory Booker would be my bet, although he's as big a phony as Obama and just as owned and controlled. Warren is an idiot with too much baggage. That and I just don't think the NWO Globalists will allow a woman to be POTUS.
So you are concerned about "NWO globalists" and you support a crony capitalist that lives in a golden tower on the East coast?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:35 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,284,461 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrpeatie View Post
After Sanders lost- his voters were left with two viable choices- Clinton or Trump.
Neither were viable. As I stated above....there is a problem still that people do not understand.

Quote:
Except for those whose only issue was changing the status quo and only changing the status quo, Clinton was the candidate closer to Sanders' stands. And he held out support until the DNC moved the party platform closer to his own policies. He got from the situation what there was to be had.
This is one of them. The party hasn't changed one bit and that was proven when the DNC elected Perez.

You've seen him getting booed, right? When he says "fall in line or get out", people are going to get out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:37 AM
 
25,857 posts, read 16,560,676 times
Reputation: 16036
Pocahontas will be on a reservation before she's in the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:39 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,112,248 times
Reputation: 9726
Pale face squaw make Minnehaha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,096,910 times
Reputation: 7099
Like any conservative will ever go along with anything a Bill Maher fan would post!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 12:04 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,112,682 times
Reputation: 6842

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUQqCUhBPA



look at this woman. She is clearly not all right in the head. Not to mention her voice sounds like nails on a chalkboard. She would lose in a landslide



Any candidate that has to constantly rely on the gender card this much is a loser. Plain and simple
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 12:14 PM
 
5,097 posts, read 2,320,431 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
Pocahontas for 2020 !!
Go for it Dems.....
Pocahontas? That's "Chief Sitting Bull$h!t" to you, sir. Show some respect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top