Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok, this is that stupid pic that Jack Probesic or however you spell his last name put up on his Twitter. The problem with it is that he didn't supply the link, so people had to go look for it. One has to wonder why he didn't supply the link.
The reason is: It had nothing to do with Trump. That was when Comey was under oath and he was asked about if the DOJ and the AG asked him to stop any investigation.
If we are going to throw facts in to liberals' faces, it has to be actual facts pertaining to the actual issue, not something that has nothing at all to do with the issue.
Let's not act like the idiots in the media who believe some memo that was read to them over the phone by some random associate of Comey...or so they claim. The left can spew out their fantasy fairy land horsecrap.
We need to stick to relevant facts.
We actually have more facts on our side than they have to support all their allegations. In fact, they have NO facts at all.
Blah, blah, deflect, deflect. Trump and Pence could end up in Jail, and you'd still be all, "but her emails!!". LOL!
Deflect?
It is you that wishes to deflect from facts being presented.
Commit perjury before a congressional investigating panel, if the memo is true. Obstructing justice if this was not brought to the DOJ immediately. Or the Clinton Crime Ring is lying and the memo doesn't say what they say it does, or it never existed.
Kind of a big hole they have dug for themselves here, after going ALL IN.
The truth will obviously come out eventually. But one wonders if there is clever word play at work here.
Comey was a seasoned professional and a lawyer...he knows that these details are rather important.
If Trump asked Comey to stop because Flynn was a "nice guy" yes, Comey could say he was not asked to stop for POLITICAL reasons and he would not be lying.
The devil, per usual, is in the details.
After all, the Clinton thing all hinged on whether or not people considered a BJ "sexual relations."
If old Bill had said "I didn't have sexual intercourse with Ms. Lewinsky" then he'd have been in the clear.
I betcha he regrets that.
Or, he could've just said "sex."
And the argument could have been "do most people think of sex as intercourse?"
Which, yes... most do.
Or, they did at the time.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
