Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2017, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,114,351 times
Reputation: 9487

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Is this just the most amazing thing? Dems lied and lied and lied about the Russian fairy tale and they want to impeach him based on their lies. People understand full well what Democrats are up too.
You say that as if you actually KNOW. You don't, you're assuming. And your assumptions are biased.

Let the investigation run it's course and THEN we'll see what happens
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2017, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,795,791 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
As a liberal, there is nothing more I'd like to see than Trump to go down.

However, as a reasonable person, I will wait until the investigation is over.

If there is evidence, Trump should be charged. Trimp supporters will be forced to eat crow. If there is no evidence, liberals need to eat crow and let it go.

Is that fair?
It has been 9 months of investigating him and his team. It began the minute he won the Primary and was began by HRC insiders.

Remember, it was HRC's team that started the birther movement the minute it looked like Obama might win the primary.

Do you not see how the Clinton's roll?


Fair? Hell no it hasn't been fair. Basically you're saying you want him to be investigated indefinitely. Fair... hah!

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
Let the investigation run it's course and THEN we'll see what happens
I doubt the investigations can manage to run a course through his second term... sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,761,687 times
Reputation: 15482
Yeah, I saw that poll.

I voted no less than a dozen times. Very easy to do, just clear your history and visit the page again. I'm sure there was at least one bot doing it. Also, CNN has an international audience, and the poll does not demand proof of citizenship before allowing you to cast your vote.

There may indeed be more americans opposed to trying Trump than supporting it. But we don't know that from this poll.

Last edited by jacqueg; 06-20-2017 at 10:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 09:50 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
It has been 9 months of investigating him and his team. It began the minute he won the Primary and was began by HRC insiders.

Remember, it was HRC's team that started the birther movement the minute it looked like Obama might win the primary.

Do you not see how the Clinton's roll?


Fair? Hell no it hasn't been fair. Basically you're saying you want him to be investigated indefinitely. Fair... hah!



I doubt the investigations can manage to run a course through his second term... sorry.
The special counsel just got appointed, they're still staffing. And here you are acting like it's taken too long. Be patient
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 09:51 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,664,869 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
CNN has never been right about anything
They are not in the business to be right. They are in the business to be FAKE and they excel at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 10:55 PM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,458,253 times
Reputation: 7444
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
Remember, it was HRC's team that started the birther movement ....
wrong.

altho there were clinton supporters ( the PUMAs ) among the birthers neither clinton or her campaign promoted birtherism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 11:05 PM
 
2,924 posts, read 1,589,004 times
Reputation: 2498
Answer: No, because:

1.) He didn't obstruct justice. (You've got him mistaken with the previous regime.)
2.) There is this DOJ ruling that's been around for at least 40 years that says that you can't go try a sitting President for obstruction of justice. That would , if it was allowed, basically allow 12 judges to bypass the impeachment, etc process set out in the US Constitution. The President is basically, or is supposed to be, the executive branch of the federal government. Thus you can't just have 12 guys try 1/3 of the federal government like that.


Thus, this whole thing is a sham and they are wasting taxpayer money, especially with those 14 lawyers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 12:10 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,819,196 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
That's exactly what was said after all online polls showed people felt Trump won the first debate with Clinton. People couldn't believe anyone felt that way. But I think the results speak for themselves.
Trump shined in the third debate. The first two were disasters for him. The third debate is the one that mattered most however. It was also the debate that solidified evangelical support for Trump. Prior to that, evangelicals weren't very warm to Trump for the most part. Without the 81% of evangelicals having voted for him, he couldn't have won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 12:29 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,734,337 times
Reputation: 3038
Since Trump supporters feel that CNN issues fake news and their polls cannot be trusted, why do they suddenly believe this "unscientific" poll?


The irony is deep! What this thread really reveals is that certain folks only believe what they want to believe.

The poll may be flawed, or it may be a true reflection of the voting public, but the fact that Trump supporters cheer the results ONLY when it suits their desire is very informative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 02:29 AM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,600,070 times
Reputation: 2398
Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
As a liberal, there is nothing more I'd like to see than Trump to go down.

However, as a reasonable person, I will wait until the investigation is over.

If there is evidence, Trump should be charged. Trump supporters will be forced to eat crow. If there is no evidence, liberals need to eat crow and let it go.

Is that fair?

pretty well put. agreed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top