Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2017, 09:50 AM
 
16,604 posts, read 8,619,550 times
Reputation: 19435

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why do Americans care more about Europe's security than the Europeans do?
I am surprised you really seem to be asking this self evident question.
America got involved in both WW1 & WW2 and lost a lot of treasure as a result. So NATO was put into place to stop communist insurgency and also help to keep the peace in that region of the world. Now with Europe under siege with Muslim extremists (some of it due to their own stupidity), NATO can help to prevent them from taking over and then forcing us to come in and clean up the mess.
We have a strategic interest in Europe and the Middle East, and do not want to be forced to repel another nation/s hell bent of world domination. NATO thus protects Europe while also protecting our own interests.

/Thread
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2017, 09:51 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwood66 View Post
I don't think anyone is arguing this point? It seems that most here understand that but say it in a different way.
But by suggesting it isn't fair implies like they 'owe' something.

They don't. Every country could raise their budget to 2% (and by the way there are no restrictions or conditions on what is in that military budget -- just the military budget total is suppose to be 2%) and it changes nothing at NATO. Absolutely nothing. Nobody will be actually physically paying more or less to anybody but their own military budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 09:58 AM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,811,117 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
But by suggesting it isn't fair implies like they 'owe' something.

They don't. Every country could raise their budget to 2% (and by the way there are no restrictions or conditions on what is in that military budget -- just the military budget total is suppose to be 2%) and it changes nothing at NATO. Absolutely nothing. Nobody will be actually physically paying more or less to anybody but their own military budget.
And yet it is a commitment they agreed to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:04 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
This in the LA Times today:



What's the point? This is stupid. If NATO member nations see no point in paying more, then why should they pay more?

The United States just keeps trying to shoehorn itself into the affairs of other regions. If the European nations don't value NATO as much as we do, then we're the idiots, not them! Why do Americans care more about Europe's security than the Europeans do? Again, these are our economic competitors, and spending billions of US taxpayer money on their defense while they take six week annual vacations and enjoy universal health coverage is insulting and SHOULD be insulting to the average American.

Trump puts North Korea on notice: U.S. weighing 'pretty severe' response - LA Times
"Why does Trump keep browbeating NATO members to "pay more?""

"What's the point? This is stupid. If NATO member nations see no point in paying more, then why should they pay more?

They SIGNED a document
stating that they would pay their share

Just like a contract.

Gee, and I thought you knew everything.Let me ask ypu a questionYou stop paying your car insurance and it expires and have an accidentDo you think they should cover the repair costs?

"
This is stupid."

No, your question is STUPID!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:08 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Because Trump thinks that everyone should pay more - except him, of course. This is part of the problem of hiring an ignorant so-called businessman with no experience in government. He thinks of everything in terms of profit and winner-take-all.
"Because Trump thinks that everyone should pay more - except him, of course"

"Ignorance is bliss"

Trump, we, ARE paying our obligated "share"

They are NOT.

And some on the left can't figure ouy how they have LOST over 1,400 political seats!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:09 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Who gives a damn about what they agreed to? They don't! The alliance is for THEIR security, not ours. So why do you want to demand that someone spends more money on their own security, and attempt to shame them into doing so by spending more of MY tax money when I don't need the damn alliance?

That's the height of stupidity. You can't see that?

People here want to gut entitlement spending, but they should be happy to kick in billions for NATO nations that don't wanna pony up? That makes sense to you?

You don't have universal healthcare, and you damn sure don't have six week paid vacations with cradle to grave social benefits....what other nation is subsidizing YOUR nation's defense while you vacation in Ibiza?

Get a clue.
"The alliance is for THEIR security, not ours."

WRONG, again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:12 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
That alliance has kept the Europeans killing each other for the past 70 years and has firmly established American economic and military hegemon on two continents and allows us to project power into the Middle East. We don't do it to protect them so much as we do it to protect our common economic interests.

Shocking as it may sound, it's not our military spending that keeps the US from enjoying paid leave and universal healthcare coverage. The money is there, it's our lack of political will and kowtowing to special interests.
"We don't do it to protect them so much as we do it to protect our common economic interests."

That concept is over his head.

He think being isolationist is the right way to go.

It was tried and didn't workout to well.

He is lacking in historical knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:15 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"Why does Trump keep browbeating NATO members to "pay more?""

"What's the point? This is stupid. If NATO member nations see no point in paying more, then why should they pay more?

They SIGNED a document
stating that they would pay their share

Just like a contract.

Gee, and I thought you knew everything.Let me ask ypu a questionYou stop paying your car insurance and it expires and have an accidentDo you think they should cover the repair costs?

"
This is stupid."

No, your question is STUPID!
No they did not sign a contract.

all the countries agreed to a GUIDELINE of 2% of GDP for their own military budget -- to be reached by 2024.

It is not a contract.

this is not car insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:15 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,448,989 times
Reputation: 6960
I don't know, why does the Left browbeat financially well off people to pay more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:16 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,758 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
IMO, NATO needs to be disbanded since it's a left over institution from the days of the Soviet Union when the U.S.S.R. was trying to expand westward. It's obsolete.
Are you sure they have no current designs on expansion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top