Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There have been FBI agents who have claimed the plot was allowed to progress because the CIA didn't want it known they had been trying to cultivate the plotters into informants. There were a number of stops inside the US where the plotters had stayed with government informants.
The collapse of building 7 is nothing more than a result of peripheral damage from the attack and possible controlled demolition in the aftermath. It fails the logic test to set up demolition charges BEFORE the attack on the only building that wasn't hit.
O'Danny, it's nice to see that your thought processes are consistent across all topics. Kudos and *ignore*.
Mostly my ignore list is packed with racists and rabid right wingers that make no logical arguments and just rant and rave but you've most assuredly earned a spot right next to them.
I'm honored, yet somewhat baffled you've taken my comments so personally. Guess dissent from the government explanation seriously upsets you.
There have been FBI agents who have claimed the plot was allowed to progress because the CIA didn't want it known they had been trying to cultivate the plotters into informants. There were a number of stops inside the US where the plotters had stayed with government informants.
The collapse of building 7 is nothing more than a result of peripheral damage from the attack and possible controlled demolition in the aftermath. It fails the logic test to set up demolition charges BEFORE the attack on the only building that wasn't hit.
Late response I know but.......really???....A "controlled demolition in the aftermath". Do you have any clue that it takes weeks if not months of planning to plan a "controlled demolition"? WTC7 collapsed less than 9 hours after the World Trade towers were hit. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY to plan and execute a controlled demolition "in the aftermath" with a burning building in the middle of a sh*tstorm. Explosives placement for a controlled demolition have to be fully researched, planned, structural studies done, etc. and you'd have to be psychotic to even attempt to plant explosives in a burning building in the middle of a chaotic situation.
If your saying that it was a controlled demolition then you are saying that it was indeed a plot and a fraud....there is NO other option if you are maintaining that.
In case anyone want to see this "horribly damaged building" that fell (in its own footprint all at once) here is a great video....skip to 7:30 minute mark:
We had a friend who worked in #7. At 7 AM that morning he and several other Executives got a phone call at home telling them they needed to go to an emergency meeting in Jersey City. They were told to go straight to NJ and not to Manhattan. I am not going to name the company but it is well known and international. The man told us he thought this was very odd at the time.
He was very grief stricken that he survived and those under him perished. Why me? Fate? Something else? Will never know.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
