Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The White House will see this as “a limited victory,” Ryan Grim tells CBS News this morning, assuming that nothing else comes out of the Robert Mueller pursue. “Is it the Trump administration colluding with Vladimir Putin to win an election? No,” Grim concludes. “It’s not even close.”
Quote:
We’re not there yet, but the indictment of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates has even less connection to the main thread of the special counsel probe than Libby did in 2006. While the indictment does state that it covers activities “from 2006 to 2017,” the financial transactions related to money laundering and tax fraud primarily took place between 2008 and 2014. The companies that allegedly acted as fronts for Manafort and Gates were formed no later than 2013. The FARA violations took place between 2006 and 2014, according to the indictment, too.
The indictment of Manafort does NOTHING to prove what the Democrats have been claiming all along. The wingnuts on the left don't understand that though. They will believe anything the DNC claims, including something as ridiculous as "A YouTube video caused a preplanned terrorist attack."
The indictment of Manafort does NOTHING to prove what the Democrats have been claiming all along. The wingnuts on the left don't understand that though. They will believe anything the DNC claims, including something as ridiculous as "A YouTube video caused a preplanned terrorist attack."
... So you are saying that any attempt to connect a dot on page 359 of the DNC "Must Win" manual, with a dot on page 28 of the "Never Trump" tome is futile?
The news about the Papadopoulos plea and cooperation with the feds is far more troublesome for the Trump campaign with regards to allegations of collusion with the Russians. The Manafort indictment is about activity before his association with the Trump campaign. It in itself does not directly tie the Trump campaign to the Russians or its former puppet Ukraine PM. It however shows Manafort himself was well connected with people that had ties to Putin and the Kremlin.
... So you are saying that any attempt to connect a dot on page 359 of the DNC "Must Win" manual, with a dot on page 28 of the "Never Trump" tome is futile?
They're gonna try anyhow, ya know.
It's just pathetic. Anyone with a brain knows this whole thing is nonsense cooked up by the DNC. Just like the YouTube video. Of course, the propaganda wing (the mainstream media) has no problem carrying the Democrats' water on this.
The national media and the Democrat Party are a joke.
The indictment of Manafort does NOTHING to prove what the Democrats have been claiming all along. The wingnuts on the left don't understand that though. They will believe anything the DNC claims, including something as ridiculous as "A YouTube video caused a preplanned terrorist attack."
Said by the same people who connected a pizza parlor with a sex ring and the Clinton.
Their job as a Leftist stormtrooper is to keep posting BS because they know their lemmings are so stupid that they will fall for anything.
Yes, the Russian collusion story has come right back into Hillary, and the democrats, and all the rats are scrambling to cover it with indictments that have nothing to do with Trump.
Mueller knew the calls for him to step down were getting louder, and were getting hard to ignore, and so he desperately is trying to keep his witch hunt alive.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.