Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No I'm not, it's still blatant corruption of the highest degree. The man was deemed unfit to serve as a judge by the organization that licenses lawyers.
do you people ever get tired of bringing up thinly veiled racist points that get easily refuted and make you look silly on every thread?
That would be an anti-racist point, would it not? And my points are seldom refuted, easily or otherwise. Certainly not by you in this thread. Better luck next time.
Elena Kagan now sits on the US Supreme Court despite having never tried a case as a lawyer or a judge. Her whole career was nothing but ethnic nepotism. You have a problem with her appointment?
Of course, not, because it's all double standards all the time.
Hmm - for one, why do you think I wouldn't have a problem with someone being unqualified for a position?
There was a strong argument to make for her. Can the same be said here? What accomplishments has this individual garnered in his young life to place him in this position?
I have pointed that out before, but the Leftists just ignore that little fact. They like their own "facts" better, and they make up rules of their own.
That would be an anti-racist point, would it not? And my points are seldom refuted, easily or otherwise. Certainly not by you in this thread. Better luck next time.
Your point was both tinged with racism and moronic. Pls continue to high five with the other Brietbart all stars about your sick burns while the adults here continue to be amazed with your “mental prowess.”
It's very thoughtful of you to give us all a warning, but at this point we've all read enough of your posts that just seeing "Roadking2003" at the top tells us what to expect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
A senior white house counsel might legally be considered NOT in government, they probably work for a law firm, who then does business with the government. Their employer would be the law firm.. not the taxpayer
You have no idea what you're talking about. She is the chief is staff for the White House counsel, has a desk in the building, and is already being interviewed as a witness in the Mueller investigation. No, no conflict of interest here!
Last edited by Mr. In-Between; 11-13-2017 at 08:43 PM..
So it turns out, the 36 year old lawyer picked for a federal judiciary position, who was unanimously rejected by the Bar Association as unqualified and who has such a right-wing bias he's unfit for the judiciary, was picked and approved by Trump/Republicans, because he's married to a senior White House Counsel lawyer.
This is so astronomically corrupt. Say what you want about Obama, but his Administration was never this openly corrupt and criminal. This isn't some limited administration position, it's a life-time term to a federal court, and people getting approved are only getting it because of their right-wing extremism and ties to the White House.
So disgusting. Republicans are truly the most corrupt people on the planet.
He didn't disclose he had sex with her the night before, either....
How does someone with a law degree for 3 years get approved for a federal court position, particularly when he was deemed not qualified by the ABA. The good news (I think) is that he still needs to be approved by the senate. The minor detail that his wife works inside the White House just might come up in the hearing.
Surely there must be some another candidate out there with 5 or 6 years experience, maybe someone even qualified
Last edited by Goodnight; 11-14-2017 at 05:57 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.