Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
At least with a President Stormy, there wouldn't be any sex scandals (except with the crew filming in the oval office).
But to be fair, those of us who voted for Trump didn't hiccup with the Stormy Daniels thing. We don't care. We knew what Trump was about.
Of course. The American people voted for Trump knowing he was a grifter. They thought he would shake up the system, and that's all that concerned them.
Trump will bob and weave, and may even win again next time. That's how desperate the American people are. No faith left in politicians.
About 20 years ago the Democrats convinced me I shouldn’t worry about the Presidents’s personal life.
the actual affair, while comical, is not the focus of this thread. the fast majority of the discussion is about the probability of campaign finance violation and money-laundering surrounding the incompetent attempt of cohen and/or trump to cover-up the affair.
Giuliani says that if it was necessary, Cohen would probably have paid off other women to keep quiet about what they did with Trump, as was done with Stormy Daniels. Is Giuliani supposed to be working on Trump's behalf? Every time he opens his mouth lately, he's making things worse for him. But I'm not complaining. If Giuliani wants to kick Trump's house of cards apart, from the inside, that would be very pleasing. Giuliani is the gift to all of us straight-thinkers, who just keeps on giving.
But isn't this something, that a sitting president needs to have a lawyer whose main job is to silence women with whom he's had sordid involvements, with big chunks of money? Apparently, there's a large slush-fund for this purpose that the lawyer manages, so Trump doesn't have to be bothered by these annoying women, who he's left scattered all over the landscape. It's just calculated into the budget, as part of the cost of being Trump.
Whatever else Stormy Daniels may be, it's quite clear that she is no "apprentice".
i get your joke but..... i actually think putting daniels, or another business savvy porn star, on "celebrity apprentice" would have been a brilliant move. i think it would have stirred just the right amount of scandal to give a nice ratings boost plus probably burst a lot of peoples preconceptions of a porn star.
it's the one time in this fiasco that i think trump did something right.
I really don't worry about another person's personal life. The 'Stormy thing' isn't about the sex it is about attempting to intimidate and incidentally maybe violating election law.
Unlike the MeToo women this was between consenting adults. Stormy has asserted that she was not coerced in any way.
The problem with Trump's behavior is that he attempts to hide it and that exposes him to being compromised by a foreign power or others who are seeking leverage. The hiding behavior involves payoffs and threats of defamation suits (which have never been filed).
Good point. I agree that Stormy Daniels should be charged with blackmail and/or extortion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
