Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't follow him or his site but he's saying "show us the evidence". There just not only isn't any...but the bizarre behavior of the "supporting cast" lends itself easily to the theory that something is not right at all about the official story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios
I find it particularly ironic that people who claim to be conservative could be so relativistic about the truth whenever it suits them.
Why is it ironic? Being conservative basically implies a high degree of skepticism. Its the people that haven't really devoted themselves to a rigorous outlook of objective analysis that tend to be overly credulous.
That is why they are so easily swayed by emotion and duped by propaganda.
Alex should not have apologized or retracted his statements regarding Chobani..he was correct that the company imports or enables the importation of disease from its foreign workers, and that this has a detrimental effect on public health.
Furthermore, the company's foreign born employees are unAmerican and have no place in our country...because the work that they perform can be performed by available American citizens.
Chobani is a socially irresponsible company whose employment practices harm American citizens, and they should not be allowed to continue these practices.
People should not patronize Chobani by purchasing or consuming any of their products until they have reformed their harmful practices and are no longer engaging in activities that harm Americans.
Sez the guy who thinks nuking Washington would be helpful to the country...
The corporate media and its subscribers hate Alex Jones because they see him as a conduit through which to rationalize and channel their Post-Trump Stress Disorder. He's an easy target to pick on because of his rhetorical style.
It's pretty obvious to me who I consider to be more exploitative and dangerous to the general public.
1. A conspiracy theory pundit who makes aggressive inductions and speculations that sometimes turn out to be mistaken or insensitive.
2. A multi-billion dollar politico-media complex that lies brazenly to its subscribers, stage-manages crime scenes to engineer social agendas, is stupid enough to believe its own rigged polls, and for which we have verifiable evidence of corruption and collusion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.