Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:16 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,438,740 times
Reputation: 1919

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
She s a liar.
Why would anyone even talk to her anymore.

 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:17 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,837,587 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Town FFX View Post
It's even more ludicrous when you consider this as well:

Mueller Examining Trump’s Tweets in Wide-Ranging Obstruction Inquiry


Then there's THIS to consider:

Mueller = Republican appointed by a Republican (Rosenstein).
Rosenstein = Republican put in charge of this because a Republican (Sessions) recused himself.
Sessions = Republican, recused himself because Trump (Republican) fired Comey (Republican at the time) for investigating Flynn (Republican) who was tied to Russia. Not to mention Flynn (Republican) was hired by Trump (Republican) after a Democrat (Obama) tried warning Trump not to.

So the only Democrat here, is one that warned hot, and said if he played with them, he'd get burned, so now what?
So exactly who are these 17 angry democrats he keeps tweeting about? Is there an actual list?
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:22 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,652,910 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
So exactly who are these 17 angry democrats he keeps tweeting about? Is there an actual list?

There's a list in the cheeto's mind. That's all that matters!
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:23 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,438,740 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
So exactly who are these 17 angry democrats he keeps tweeting about? Is there an actual list?
Dunno but Trump tops the list of one rapid angry democratic republican.

Amazing.

2 days of Manafort not even complete and he s lost it.

Just wait til they come for he and his crooked kids.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:41 PM
 
26,584 posts, read 14,458,253 times
Reputation: 7441
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
So exactly who are these 17 angry democrats .....

somewhere there's a fledgling indie band that just found their name.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:45 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,837,587 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
somewhere there's a fledgling indie band that just found their name.
Maybe a big-band, but yeah.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 02:00 PM
 
51,654 posts, read 25,843,388 times
Reputation: 37894
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Sarah Huckabee Sanders missed on all counts.

Dossier is not dirty, has not been discredited (quite the opposite), nor was it the basis for this investigation.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 03:11 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,438,740 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Sarah Huckabee Sanders missed on all counts.

Dossier is not dirty, has not been discredited (quite the opposite), nor was it the basis for this investigation.
Dirty is in the eye of the beholder.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 06:05 PM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,016,074 times
Reputation: 10416
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
So exactly who are these 17 angry democrats he keeps tweeting about? Is there an actual list?

He has increased the number of angry Democrats, from 12 to 17. I suspect that, by mid-September, he will increase the number again. Let us see: he went from 12 to 17, an addition of five. One would think that by my deadline he would add another five, for 22.



However, 22 is a suspicious number. So, I think Our President will go for a more soothing number, such as 26, or perhaps an angry number, such as 29.



Of course, Mr. Trump may simply decide to double the number, to 34. It is easy to do, and is a 'good' number.
 
Old 08-01-2018, 06:17 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,837,587 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
He has increased the number of angry Democrats, from 12 to 17. I suspect that, by mid-September, he will increase the number again. Let us see: he went from 12 to 17, an addition of five. One would think that by my deadline he would add another five, for 22.



However, 22 is a suspicious number. So, I think Our President will go for a more soothing number, such as 26, or perhaps an angry number, such as 29.



Of course, Mr. Trump may simply decide to double the number, to 34. It is easy to do, and is a 'good' number.
I'd actually lean towards your 29 number which is also the next number in a Fibonacci sequence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top