Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should pot mokers be allowed to collect unemployment?
Yes 43 63.24%
No 25 36.76%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:38 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HedgeYourInvestments View Post
If they don't test for alcohol, I don't see why they should test for pot. Especially in states where recreational marijuana has been legalized.
I can be checked for alcohol also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:39 PM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,293,931 times
Reputation: 41015
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
This is dumb. I haven’t had to submit to a drug test since the year 2000. I don’t know a single person who gets drug-tested. Besides, how would you go about finding out who smokes marijuana? You would spend more money testing people than you would save by eliminating the smokers.
Many companies drug test as well as perform background checks before they hire someone. That's reality and someone who tests positive for pot won't get the job even in a state where it's legal. Therefore it makes sense not to give pot smokers unemployment since they make themselves unemployable to some extent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:41 PM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,333,862 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
Many companies drug test as well as perform background checks before they hire someone. That's reality and someone who tests positive for pot won't get the job even in a state where it's legal. Therefore it makes sense not to give pot smokers unemployment since they make themselves unemployable to some extent.
The governments of Maine, Oregon, Colorado, and Wisconson disagrees with you, and is working on legislation to prove it. Your bias against pot isn't going to hold up if you're an employer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:42 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
Many companies drug test as well as perform background checks before they hire someone. That's reality and someone who tests positive for pot won't get the job even in a state where it's legal. Therefore it makes sense not to give pot smokers unemployment since they make themselves unemployable to some extent.
You have to pass an aptitude test where I work to get hired. Should we exclude those who can not pass it from unemployment also?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
6,830 posts, read 3,223,339 times
Reputation: 11577
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
no to unemployment

the answer might be disability, since their condition is what is making them unemployable
Should drunks not be allowed unemployment?

Last edited by Willamette City; 05-10-2018 at 03:15 PM.. Reason: important word added
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:43 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raddo View Post
The governments of Maine, Oregon, Colorado, and Wisconson disagrees with you, and is working on legislation to prove it. Your bias against pot isn't going to hold up if you're an employer.
Yes it will. Alcohol is legal but I can still be fired for having it in my system at work. Making pot legal (which I support) will not negate employment rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
6,830 posts, read 3,223,339 times
Reputation: 11577
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorman View Post
I have never had to take a drug test and have been working for 20 years. What kinds of jobs do people have where they are getting tested? I guess I am in the right occupation or industry to avoid this nonsense.

Can't you just quit for a couple weeks and be good to go? It is not like quitting weed causes serious withdrawal symptoms. I know people that have used fake urine to beat the tests. If someone comes up with a pill or drink that can clean you out overnight, they would make major cash.
It takes about 30 days to get all THC out of your system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:44 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,970,308 times
Reputation: 9227
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
This is getting tricky for companies to deny employent over pot because either recreational or medical pot is legal in many states, with new states passing laws each year. I think proof of marijuana use can stay in the body for several weeks, possibly a couple months. If someone went to Colorado 3 weeks ago and had a pot brownie, would a future employer turn them down due to failing the drug test.

Pretty soon companies will be forced to remove pot from the tests, as more states make it legal. It's like telling someone they aren't getting hired because they had a Bud Light 2 weeks ago on a Saturday night.
Right! In the last two month, I’ve been to a legal country (Canada), city (DC) and I’m going to a legal state next week. If I were to test positive for marijuana, there would be no indication that I’ve done anything wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:45 PM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,293,931 times
Reputation: 41015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willamette City View Post
Should drunks be allowed unemployment?
Probably not although both pot smokers and "drunks" should be able to go into a rehab and get treatment if they need to. If smoking pot or drinking alcohol is more important to someone than being employed, they have a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2018, 02:45 PM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,333,862 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes it will. Alcohol is legal but I can still be fired for having it in my system at work. Making pot legal (which I support) will not negate employment rules.
Like I said in a previous post, and provided links for, legislation is in the works that will change the employment rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top