What First Amendment?

[phma]

Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell

The radical right has been making continual attacks on the First Amendment. They want to repeal freedom of religion, and use government money to dictate what people pray. They are continually attacking the press as "Fake News," and "Lies." Now they are arresting people in the middle of the night for speaking out on social media about a grievance against the government. They couldn't find a judge who would let them proceed to trial, but they held him in jail for 5 months, while he lost his car and his home.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...P=share_btn_fb

Projection.

Does it work ?

Not on people who have seen it done over and over by the left.

[zeliner]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

the constitution didn't GRANT or take away rights... the constitution reaffirmed your NATURAL right... and the left wants to take away your NATURAL right that the constitution reaffirmed (validated, acknowledged)

liberalism is evil

If you think that "NATURAL right" means some kinda Darwinian only-the-fittest-reigns-supreme, and is allowed to dominate, because those with the might deserve the right to dominate those who don't, then you're a fascist and utterly delusional.

That type of thinking amongst humans lacks vision, is utterly counter-productive, and can only lead to more human discord. Human discord in the form of more racial, ethnic, and national conflict. These types of conflicts can only precipitate more violence and global militarism.

The Alt-Right, Isolationism, Tribalism, and Nationalism, will only stifle and retard our global progression towards developing a greater global civilization.

The racial supremacist ideology is seriously flawed and devoid of critical scientific thought. It also lacks vision, human ingenuity, and compassion.

Of course, it's difficult to cultivate human compassion under unbridled influence of narcissism.

At some point all of this cyclical human aggression and the subsequent rationalizations given to support it, must stop!

[Larry Caldwell]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

wrong....the republican confirmed almost all of obozo's appointees....only in the last year of his admin, did they refuse a SC appointee

Comey an Obama appointee
McCabe an Obama appointee twice (deputy assistant in 2011, and deputy director in 2016)


the crooked cops..... liberal appointees

Your memory is faulty. This is from Obama's first term.

Harry Reid says 82 presidential nominees have been blocked under President Barack Obama, 86 blocked under all other presidents | PolitiFact

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell

Your memory is faulty. This is from Obama's first term.

apparently you have difficulty with the language

.the republican confirmed almost all of obozo's appointees...... AFTER a filibuster to DISCUSS the merits of said candidate.... have you ever seen "mr smith goes to Washington" filibusters are good as they bring up conversation instead of just blindly voting like sheep




Comey was an Obama appointee
McCabe was an Obama appointee twice (deputy assistant in 2011, and deputy director in 2016)



to sit there an say none of obama's appointees got in is a lie... and crooked cops comey/McCabe are prove that that statement is a lie
do you forget you are the one who told this lie

Did you forget that the Republicans refused to confirm any Obama appointees? You can't blame this one on the Democrats.

the fascist liberals continue to lie

the crooked cops..... liberal appointees

[Clarallel]

Wow. Thanks so much for your post.

This makes me think back to things I've heard/read about J. Edgar Hoover's F.B.I. In fact, James Comey used to have a reminder in his office not to fall into that mindset.