Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Given Obama's track record with foreign policy, it's just as well he didn't meet with NK. His mantra of "leading from behind" is not a recipe for success.
I agree with your specific point... there would be calls for multi-lateral talks with multiple nations involved, if it was Obama.
What's the difference? Couldn't trust Obama with national security... couldn't trust him dealing with Iran and N. Korea.
With Trump, if nothing else - he has been a hawk for border and national security, and people have realized that he will back up his talk.
Cliff notes... Trump is more trusted on the N. Korea issue than Obama.
Why couldn’t Obama be trusted? What’s a legitimate reason? The color of his skin, his middle name, or the supposed birth certificate controversy aren’t legitimate reasons.
Obama's weakness has nothing to do with things he did/did not get accomplished. He's just a weak person. I applaud him for being elected president for example, but he is still a weak person.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
