Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Theyre perfectly willing to throw any of their operatives under the bus as long as they can keep rabidly focused on the object of their derrangement.
Theyll all go down in one big slide.
Except he didn't extract and transmit the SDNY indictment.
Yes, he did, That's the only way it gets onto his personal email server.
Quote:
This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time
Any particular reason you don't comprehend "under seal?"
FBI Director Wray doesn't care about restoring the publics trust. He said so. His concern is the people the FBI interacts with. He wants to protect the FBI and those that have contact with the FBI. The greater public confidence is not on his list of priorities.
He doesn't want to turn over anything that may embarrass the FBI. His position is consistent with past Directors who want the government to operate in unquestioned secrecy.
All true and he is aided by his "boss", the DOJ.
We have to keep in mind the New Comey interpretation "called the Hillary Rule" that Intent to commit a Felony must be proven and when the accused says "I didn't intend" ..... that's good enough for no prosecution. . In other words .... it's only a Felony IF the accused agrees that it's a Felony and the accused is the Decider.
We have 2 sets of Laws/Rules - one for the Elites and one for the peons.
Yes, he did, That's the only way it gets onto his personal email server.
Nothing says he had the sealed indictment on his personal email. Why did you assume he had the sealed indictment on his personal email when nothing indicates this? It says he emailed the draft of the search warrant to his personal email.
Nothing says he had the sealed indictment on his personal email.
Actually, it does:
Quote:
"During our review, we identified several instances where Strzok used his personal email account for government business.
Examples included an email chain forwarded to Strzok's personal email account on December 10, 2016, discussing a draft congressional response, and draft versions of emails on his personal email account that Strzok eventually sent to other FBI employees using his government account.
Most troubling, on October 29, 2016, Strzok forwarded from his FBI account to his personal email account an email about the proposed search warrant the Midyear team was seeking on the Weiner laptop. This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time in the Southern District of New York and information obtained pursuant to a grand jury subpoena issued in the Eastern District of Virginia in the Midyear investigation."
It clearly states that he emailed the search warrant. It says the search warrant contained info about the investigation.
It does NOT state that he emailed the sealed indictment. An indictment is a specific document. That's not the document which he emailed.
You said the law prohibits transmitting a sealed indictment. A search warrant and an indictment are two different documents. They are related in this case because a case can have many different documents. But they are still two different documents.
Do you understand they are two different documents? A search warrant is not an indictment. An indictment is not a search warrant.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.