Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,393,727 times
Reputation: 8828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
We already know he's committed at least one felony. Read my new thread.
Nope. Not a chance. Simply killed immediately by reasonable doubt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,410 posts, read 26,350,013 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
We already know he's committed at least one felony. Read my new thread.
Downloading Weiners indictment to his personal email is a felony?

You needed a new thread for that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Northern Maine
5,466 posts, read 3,075,867 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by magaalot View Post
So why did you bring up Trump?
Theyre perfectly willing to throw any of their operatives under the bus as long as they can keep rabidly focused on the object of their derrangement.
Theyll all go down in one big slide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,718 posts, read 16,890,748 times
Reputation: 41864
Quote:
Originally Posted by magaalot View Post
So why did you bring up Trump?

Because we just like saying his name !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,311 posts, read 45,022,208 times
Reputation: 13783
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Except he didn't extract and transmit the SDNY indictment.
Yes, he did, That's the only way it gets onto his personal email server.

Quote:
This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time
Any particular reason you don't comprehend "under seal?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:23 PM
 
17,485 posts, read 9,308,096 times
Reputation: 11953
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
FBI Director Wray doesn't care about restoring the publics trust. He said so. His concern is the people the FBI interacts with. He wants to protect the FBI and those that have contact with the FBI. The greater public confidence is not on his list of priorities.
He doesn't want to turn over anything that may embarrass the FBI. His position is consistent with past Directors who want the government to operate in unquestioned secrecy.
All true and he is aided by his "boss", the DOJ.

We have to keep in mind the New Comey interpretation "called the Hillary Rule" that Intent to commit a Felony must be proven and when the accused says "I didn't intend" ..... that's good enough for no prosecution. . In other words .... it's only a Felony IF the accused agrees that it's a Felony and the accused is the Decider.

We have 2 sets of Laws/Rules - one for the Elites and one for the peons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:23 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,530,189 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, he did, That's the only way it gets onto his personal email server.
Nothing says he had the sealed indictment on his personal email. Why did you assume he had the sealed indictment on his personal email when nothing indicates this? It says he emailed the draft of the search warrant to his personal email.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:32 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,311 posts, read 45,022,208 times
Reputation: 13783
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Nothing says he had the sealed indictment on his personal email.
Actually, it does:
Quote:
"During our review, we identified several instances where Strzok used his personal email account for government business.
Examples included an email chain forwarded to Strzok's personal email account on December 10, 2016, discussing a draft congressional response, and draft versions of emails on his personal email account that Strzok eventually sent to other FBI employees using his government account.

Most troubling, on October 29, 2016, Strzok forwarded from his FBI account to his personal email account an email about the proposed search warrant the Midyear team was seeking on the Weiner laptop. This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time in the Southern District of New York and information obtained pursuant to a grand jury subpoena issued in the Eastern District of Virginia in the Midyear investigation."
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download


Felony. Prison. Now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:36 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,311 posts, read 45,022,208 times
Reputation: 13783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Downloading Weiners indictment to his personal email is a felony?
When it and the info contained in such is under seal, yes. It's a felony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 12:38 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,530,189 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Actually, it does:
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download


Felony. Prison. Now.
It clearly states that he emailed the search warrant. It says the search warrant contained info about the investigation.

It does NOT state that he emailed the sealed indictment. An indictment is a specific document. That's not the document which he emailed.

You said the law prohibits transmitting a sealed indictment. A search warrant and an indictment are two different documents. They are related in this case because a case can have many different documents. But they are still two different documents.

Do you understand they are two different documents? A search warrant is not an indictment. An indictment is not a search warrant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top