Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Some are demonizing based strictly based on party affiliation, but fact is she's running on a platform that requires coercion and violence for implementation i.e. socialism. You okay with that?
What domestic violence was involved during the passage of the new deal ? I will also reassert many capitalist countries offer better programs for their people for example Germany, Canada, France, Scandanavian nations. No violence needed just enlightened voting. Plus no one is advocating for the State to take control of the means of production. But you already know that. I know you know that so why continue to demonize poor Ocasio ?
Some are demonizing based strictly based on party affiliation, but fact is she's running on a platform that requires coercion and violence for implementation i.e. socialism. You okay with that?
Yes exactly . Socialism has a bad track record . It’s not like this is some new idea she came up with .
It’s ironic that those talking about equality would be fine with taking over private businesses or property .
How is that fair or just?
Someone worked hard to build a business and then it just gets seized ? This is what productive Immigrants escaped from !
We need more financial literacy , more entrepreneurs in low income neighborhoods. Not socialism .
Yes exactly . Socialism has a bad track record . It’s not like this is some new idea she came up with .
It’s ironic that those talking about equality would be fine with taking over private businesses or property .
How is that fair or just?
Someone worked hard to build a business and then it just gets seized ? This is what productive Immigrants escaped from !
We need more financial literacy , more entrepreneurs in low income neighborhoods. Not socialism .
Your smarter then that. She is not advocating what your mentioning and you know better. Jim there really is no point in speaking to you. So long.
Lol so you called me stupid for saying that the housing projects were initially built to be temporary and then you quote something proving that .
Maybe an apology is in order?
I never called you stupid, but read this again...
Quote:
As part of the war mobilization, entire communities sprang up around factories manufacturing military goods. In 1940, Congress therefore authorized the US Housing Authority to build twenty public housing developments around these private companies to sustain the war effort. There was considerable debate over whether these should be permanent dwellings, furthering reformer goals of establishing a broader public housing effort, or temporary dwellings in keeping with the timeliness of the need. The Defense Housing Division was founded in 1941 and would ultimately construct eight developments of temporary housing, though many ended up as long-term housing after the war.
I'm not sure how an article about temporary war housing proves your point but if you think it does then enjoy the moment
Interesting article about the production company that did her campaign video
It’s run by leftists that used to work for doing advertising for corporations . based out of Detroit .
You thought that she hired conservatives to make the ad?
She won because she got more votes than the other guy.
Sometimes people get tired of the same old same.
Yeah sometimes the devil you know is better than the one you don’t .
Just voting for someone new with old failed ideas ( socialism ) doesn’t seem too smart .
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.