Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh heavens, so fishy. If you'd read the entire article you posted from MSNBC (lol), you'd know it's just a retweet essentially of a CNN article they link to. If you click on the CNN link to read the actual story, you'd have noticed the following:
"Trump has shown an affinity for meeting individually with his counterparts before opening the room to fuller delegations. During his historic summit with Kim Jong Un last month, Trump met for about an hour with just the North Korean dictator, joined only by their translators. Emerging from the face-to-face, Trump told reporters the discussion was "very, very good."
I think it's a wise move. Get an honest non filtered gauge of someone's intentions, build some rapport and calculate your next move in the formal summit.
I think it's a wise move. Get an honest non filtered gauge of someone's intentions, build some rapport and calculate your next move in the formal summit.
The exception is lack of an aide, I mean witness.
Putin will have one interpreter. Best scenario for the habitual liar.
Trump wants to meet Putin alone with no aides present. If Obama did stuff like this, Fox News would lose their collective minds. While my first thought is they want to high five each other, I can't help but worry just what Trump is agreeing to. I don't trust him one bit.
A private meeting between Trump and Putin would be fine with me. If it's recorded.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.