California mayor wants to pay violent criminals who "regularly shoot guns" $1,000/mo. not to shoot people (Iran, controversial)

[mightleavenyc]

I believe this is a new low in liberal stupidity.

https://www.sfgate.com/local/article...h-11270588.php

The second option is more controversial out of the Bay Area. Richmond's Advance Peace uses taxpayer dollars to pay men with firearm history to not shoot guns.

[camaro69]

Originally Posted by mightleavenyc

I believe this is a new low in liberal stupidity.

https://www.sfgate.com/local/article...h-11270588.php

Can't make this stuff up.

[shadowne]

What could possibly go wrong?

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

That's about as stupid as giving Iran $1.5 billion on a promise not to build nukes.

[Kevroqs]

Stuff like this is why some Californians hate paying taxes, and end up leaving the state.

[Roboteer]

I know a good deal when I see one. How many people do I have to shoot to qualify for the $1,000/mo?

[phma]

Funding a criminal enterprise. That's the way the liberals roll.

[neko_mimi]

Does that include 30 years of back pay?

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by mightleavenyc

I believe this is a new low in liberal stupidity.

I disagree.

[Chicano3000X]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

That's about as stupid as giving Iran $1.5 billion on a promise not to build nukes.

Wasn't that their money?