Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Which makes the concerted multiple independent companies making a big show all at once, reeks Racketeering, Collusion and Coercion.
That is illegal. It is organized crime.
Exactly why Standard Oil was broken up.
A monopoly, created among High Tech.
Clearly, you do not understand the definition of "monopoly", let alone "anti-trust", "collusion", or "crime".
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
Research it yourself, I'm tired of doing your homework.
LMAO, isn't that what you accuse "lefties" of saying?
Oh, the irony ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
It says more about you, that you would cheer a mans tongue being cut out, all because you are afraid of what he might say.
No one's tongue has been cut out, literally or figuratively.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Quote:
You people are EVIL.
The spawn of SATAN, is an insult to Lucifer.
Have you seen the government's track record at running things?
Services cost too much, and quality sucks. They couldn't build an effective health care website. How are they are running public education? The Post Office? Student Loans?
Throw in the fact that the NSA would be tapping every internet connection more than they are already - all in the name of monitoring the ISPs to make sure they are behaving themselves. How would they use the data? Don't answer that.
What in the name of all that's holy and unholy does that have to do with NN?
It says more about you, that you would cheer a mans tongue being cut out, all because you are afraid of what he might say.
You people are EVIL.
The spawn of SATAN, is an insult to Lucifer.
Goodness. Again, we are all legally allowed to keep our tongues and use them. He still has his. What he or anyone else isn't guaranteed is a megaphone to amplify their voice. YouTube decided to take theirs away from him.
Your e-mail provider does not read your mail edit and and censor it.
Ya, it is like you cannot be charged for bank robbery, because you are already charged with stealing the get away car.
And for those that went along with this forum cannot be sued, like a led you right where I wanted you. You agreed because that is what you wanted to hear.
The truth is City Data can be sued for what is on these here forums.
People in control of things, have not hidden their bias. It is the reason Personal attacks are not tolerated. Even typing out a users name in a post can be taken the wrong way. Hit the report post, before filing the lawsuit!
No web site is going to be sued (not by anyone with half a brain) because a member on that website called another member an idiot.
LOL. Frivolous suit.
There are reasons a site might be sued, but bickering between members? Not high up that list of reasons. In fact, not really on it.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
False! This has nothing to do with so-called, "net neutrality," which has nothing to do with keeping the Internet free and open, but instead is all about government control.
Do you find that flat-out lying is an effective debate tactic?
And? This says that YouTube won't be held accountable legally for what its users do. It doesn't mean that they have to allow it on there to begin with or keep people who do that sort of thing around.
As long as there are no threats of personal harm to another, or threats of sedation, which are crimes. They are protected by what people say.
But once you start removing content, you have published, you now have an editor and no longer have those protections. You have hired those protections to remove content you now don't like.
You went from just a content provider, to a content publisher, with an editor, to push a narrative and remove the narrative you don't push.
The fact they admit to censoring hate speech, which is not a crime, they have admitted to being a publisher and not solely a content provider.
As long as there are no threats of personal harm to another, or threats of sedation, which are crimes. They are protected by what people say.
Wut?
Quote:
But once you start removing content, you have published, you now have an editor and no longer have those protections. You have hired those protections to remove content you now don't like.
That's not what this means. That's not what any of this means.
Quote:
You went from just a content provider, to a content publisher, with an editor, to push a narrative and remove the narrative you don't push.
Do you even know what monopoly means and antitrust is all about? In order for this to be the case, AJ and INFOwars would need to be competitor to YouTube. They are not. There also exists competitors of YouTube for which they did not collude against.
Do you even know what rackateering means?
By removing Jones, they proved Jones is now a Competitor for publishing content.
By removing Jones, they proved Jones is now a Competitor for publishing content.
No, they're just tired of that mentally unstable fools drivel.
He's an ******* that's used others suffering for attention. Facebook, google, apple etc don't have to let him have access to anything they own.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
