The NY Times thinks the Constitution has to go (Mexicans, election, elect)

[BBMW]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/o...acy-trump.html

I searched to see if this was posted previously, but didn't see anything.

[TEPLimey]

Originally Posted by BBMW

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/o...acy-trump.html

I searched to see if this was posted previously, but didn't see anything.

I see you didn't read the article, which says nothing close to "the Constitution has to go".

[Floorist]

That reporter was too dumb to understand that were are not a democracy. So the rest is not important.

[middle-aged mom]

It's an Opinion Piece. Most high profile papers print all sorts of Opinion pieces, including conflicting opinions.

Prior to the election, Trump called the Electoral College a rigged system. This sentiment is shared by many on all sides of the political spectrum.

Had Trump won the popular vote and lost the College ( as he expected to do) he would be first in line the Constitution needed to be rewritten to enable a democratic election process.

[jacqueg]

The NYT thinks no such thing. The opinion piece they published is written by people who think that the constitution could/should be amended to allow for more direct democracy.

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by Floorist

That reporter was too dumb to understand that were are not a democracy. So the rest is not important.

1) It’s an op-ed, no reporter involved.

2) Didn’t read it, did you?

[Dbones]

Once again resident Leftists defending their favorite Anti-American news outlet writing Anti Constitutional stuff because they lost an election.

[WaldoKitty]

The NYT is owned by Mexicans and George Soros.

Of course they want to see the US Constitution torn up.

[TEPLimey]

Originally Posted by Dbones

Once again resident Leftists defending their favorite Anti-American news outlet writing Anti Constitutional stuff because they lost an election.

Oh good, a pointless tangent. I was hoping for one of those on the first page.

[jacqueg]

Originally Posted by TEPLimey

Oh good, a pointless tangent. I was hoping for one of those on the first page.

Well, it saves time...