Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They're 2-year-olds throwing a temper tantrum in the grocery store because they're not getting the candy/toy they wanted. Yes, they create a scene, and people watch, but not approvingly so. Honestly, it's a pattern. The left hasn't developed cognitively beyond the intellectual age of a young child.
The left can't get their agenda passed by Congress so they rely on the courts to enact their destructive policies by inventing new interpretations of laws that don't exist.
Democrats lose 2014 elections, bigly, due to Obama & Harry Reid's horrendous policies. When combined with the stunning loss of accused rapist Bill Clinton's anointed drunken wife, Democrats lost a once in a generation chance to remake the Supreme Court.
I get why that stings the Democrats, what's left of them, badly. So they kick & scream like kids. Like crying on election night.
The voters spoke. The Constitution wins.
Can't say I don't get some insidious pleasure out of listening to the whining and whimpering.
You’d think they’d have some type of “contempt of court” to deal with these obnoxious liberals.
Because its a "hearing" and not a court, or committee meeting, no such rules apply. They should just throw everyone out NOT invited by the nominee. There is no obligation to allow the public to be in the same room.
Can't say I don't get some insidious pleasure out of listening to the whining and whimpering.
That's nice. Make no mistake, what comes around goes around and after the moves Trump and his supporters have made, I'm looking forward to a lot of crying on the other side and it too will be delicious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm
Because its a "hearing" and not a court, or committee meeting, no such rules apply. They should just throw everyone out NOT invited by the nominee. There is no obligation to allow the public to be in the same room.
Considering how much the GOP has kept hidden from the public, it would be no surprise. Turn the government into a big black box with no visibility whatsoever.
McConnell has already shown politics matters more than the constitution, to hold the hearings in secret is EXACTLY what we would expect from this administration.
Oh yes, refusing to even consider the SC choice of a Democratic president is so much better.
Dont just lock Hillary up. Put all of DC in a giant weaponized cage match. They are just infestations of the fringes of their respective loony party bases.
Democracy is loud and messy. I know yall arent big fans of Democracy, but its worked for a while, lets keep going with it ok?
They actually hate democracy which is how they can possibly find it within themselves to support a POS such as Trump and his admiration for and kowtowing to dictators.
Show where in the constitution it says the Senate should not hold hearings for a SCJ nominee in the last year of a president's term. SHOW IT.
Didn't Joe Biden show it to you ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh yes, refusing to even consider the SC choice of a Democratic president is so much better.